S.A.F.C. - the future

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Nixon is answering all SAFC questions tonight....
You must log in or register to see media

You must log in or register to see media

You must log in or register to see media

You must log in or register to see media
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blond Bombshell
Pretty embarased by some of these reactions frankly.

Concord Rangers - three promotions up to their highest ever position
Braintree (one season) - took to highest ever league position
Lincoln - 2 promotions in 3 years to their highest ever league position
Huddersfield - took the team bottom of the table with 1 point in 7 games to safety. If the season only took place whilst he was manager they'd have finished 9th.

Forget anything else - he has a record of achieving or even over-achieving.

Is he perfect? No.

But people are acting like he's the worst choice in the world. Grow up.
I find it to embarrassing to talk to one lad on here just dismissed saving Huddersfield as though it was a every day occurrence, check to see how many clubs have stopped up after having 1 point from 7 games, I reckon he must only be about 13.
 
Very true. Most outside of Sunderland are our club as a basket case. Most managers at champ or Orem level won’t touch us with a barge pole, regardless of who owns or runs the club.

some need a reality check methinks.
You will never find the culprits giving you lads a like, thick as pig **** and as blind as Stevie Wonder.
 
I reckon it will be Keith downie tonight. He usually follows up when he breaks something like yesterday
 
No, surely if no one person has more than 50%, Dreyfus and Sartori could account for 80% of it

Basicially hes just saying that not 1 person has final say.... ie if Donald had a 49% share and a 50 man consortium had a 51% share, no one in that consortium has final say and they all need to get along but in essence they have control
 
Cowley's name gaining more traction with the ITK's and some people I've spoken to, not fully against the idea but certainly not over enthusiastic about his "potential" appointment either.

Let's hope this "Takeover" happens.