Just read through the Times article and it looks like a journalist playing catch up, picking up bits of info from different places and cobbling something together.
He doesn't seem sure about where the process is either tbh. It looks like they've written an article before the Guardian and have now had to alter it.
go for it matei would like the takeover completed as a 65th birthday present, so get cracking and sort it before next Friday!
Then I would like the owners to find the u21 equivalents of Elliot, Arnott, Rowel, and Johnny Evans and blast through the division Keano style.
However I am happy to wait in my shed for it to get sorted, not sure I am up to shed dancing like Hank but I might give it a go.
Bloke who wrote this is a mag
Bring it forward 24 hours and complete on the Thursday for my 40th hahai would like the takeover completed as a 65th birthday present, so get cracking and sort it before next Friday!
Then I would like the owners to find the u21 equivalents of Elliot, Arnott, Rowel, and Johnny Evans and blast through the division Keano style.
However I am happy to wait in my shed for it to get sorted, not sure I am up to shed dancing like Hank but I might give it a go.
@Magnus might be able to solve this
Sd never had 100%
Wt did he hold
Now dose he hold 15% of what he had before
@Magnus might be able to solve this
Sd never had 100%
Wt did he hold
Now dose he hold 15% of what he had before
So now sd has 15% 74 = less than 11%Donald 74%
Sartori 20%
Methvin 6%
Agree you can’t agree or will agreeI've just gone through it again.
What he's saying is that a price has been agreed before due diligence has been done.
Which is basically, "OK I'll give you £22m oh and, btw, do you mind if I have a look at the books to be on the safe side."
Nonsense.
@Magnus might be able to solve this
Sd never had 100%
Wt did he hold
Now dose he hold 15% of what he had before


Fantastic. Hopefully the new owners can get this right!That and the video that united fan did in the semi final second leg, must have watched it 20 times at least. Amazing to think how good it can be, considering how bad its got. Let's just hope something positive happens soon
Edit : ah **** it, we've all seen it loads but I'll link it again anywayYou must log in or register to see media
I reakon furhman is one of them.My guess based on what we’ve seen so far (and it’s a guess) is that Donald is selling 60% of his shares in Madrox to a consortium including KLD and others.
Sartori keeps his 20%
Methven keeps his 6% (which has been misreported by the guardian - makes no sense him dropping to 5%)
Would leave Donald with 14%.
How that remaining 60% gets split is what I’m interested in. Nobody seems to know that yet (only Roker Report have said it’s all 60% for KLD)
So now sd has 15% 74 = less than 11%
Is that correct
It’s 11.1%

My guess based on what we’ve seen so far (and it’s a guess) is that Donald is selling 60% of his shares in Madrox to a consortium including KLD and others.
Sartori keeps his 20%
Methven keeps his 6% (which has been misreported by the guardian - makes no sense him dropping to 5%)
Would leave Donald with 14%.
How that remaining 60% gets split is what I’m interested in. Nobody seems to know that yet (only Roker Report have said it’s all 60% for KLD)
im sure I read a report before saying JS and the kid to own 60%My guess based on what we’ve seen so far (and it’s a guess) is that Donald is selling 60% of his shares in Madrox to a consortium including KLD and others.
Sartori keeps his 20%
Methven keeps his 6% (which has been misreported by the guardian - makes no sense him dropping to 5%)
Would leave Donald with 14%.
How that remaining 60% gets split is what I’m interested in. Nobody seems to know that yet (only Roker Report have said it’s all 60% for KLD)
I reakon furhman is one of them.
That’s what the times say - it says Donald is selling them 60%. But Sartori already owns 20%, so that’s 80% total owned between them.im sure I read a report before saying JS and the kid to own 60%
So if that’s true be interesting
To see what happens with other 20%
I was told last week that Furhman would no longer be involved. The other about mentioning the others linked and we were miles off turned out correct, really hope the info about Furhman isn’t.Another thing to add - I think we can all agree it would make zero sense for the FPP loan to not be paid back. So either they have a stake now or they’re gone. Surely?