S.A.F.C. - the future

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I think it's 75%+ ownership of a company enables you to make those kind of decisions
Oh ok thanks.

In that case, What if Donald sold sartori 20% of his 94% rather than 20% of Madrid. I think that might keep him above 75%. It’s the way I would have done it if it meant I could keep more control.

Apologies if maths is wrong. Probably not done like that anyway.
 
They also said the salary cap has stopped them in their tracks and they had to change tac .. I don't care what you think I enjoyed it .

TBH, if he said that, and if they think it, there is no real determined ambition to use any advantage our size of club might have. This cap is so obviously illegal that any serious club would challenge it. It is absurd, backward and soviet in it's thinking.
 
TBH, if he said that, and if they think it, there is no real determined ambition to use any advantage our size of club might have. This cap is so obviously illegal that any serious club would challenge it. It is absurd, backward and soviet in it's thinking.

apparently at least some clubs are looking at the legal side of this...the FA/EFL and the rest can simply put something in place, force clubs to abide by it until a challenge is made...unfortunately, as a member of the EFL the clubs have to follow the guidelines until such time as they get a change.

legal proceedings, as most will already know, are slow enough to begin with without the added 'strain and difficulty' of working around the pandemic rules...i think most if not all clubs will do as they are told at the minute rather than take a points loss and or fines.