Let's be clear, there is no way this has slipped out by accident and I can think of only 2 reasons why we would choose to draw attention to the clause:
1) For whatever reason we want to sell whilst claiming 'there was nothing the club could do about it' and painting Koren and his agent as the villains of the piece. It's the perfect way to make an unpopular sale.
2) We expect him to sign a new contract with no such clause or expect him to simply refuse to leave even if the clause is met, therefore showcasing to everyone how much faith there is in the 'brave new Hull City' and a wave of optimism takes us towards the title.
I reckon it's number 1.
I have no problem with Koren going to the PL, it's forward step for him but going to Leicester is a sideways step at least and I would argue that it's a backwards one judging by our movement in the transfer window. If he goes to Leicester it's for money and nothing else. Luckily though this isn't happening on deadline day so we have plenty of time to replace him if he does leave.
Cannot agree more with this post. Thats why its only the neg heads who think Koren will go.