And I am not forecasting. I am asking a question.
Called it!
*As I know your tedious pedantry of old, I know you're presenting them as questions but we both know that's just a rhetorical device
Vin
And I am not forecasting. I am asking a question.
*As I know your tedious pedantry of old, I know you're presenting them as questions but we both know that's just a rhetorical device
No our production won't drop to 0. That doesn't happen even in ruined countries like Somalia.
Little hard to argue this because you haven't provided alternatives or even any negatives or positives so I'll just give future predictions.
Japan is at a very similar level of economic development to our own currently. Japan used to be colonised by China which is why they use Chinese script. China naturally should be on equal footing to us. They have fertile land and decent resources. They were at a high level of technical advancement having developed gunpowder etc before us. But they were very slow to adopt globalism. Japan however were very quick, had a revolution on the subject, And as such their economy quickly grew to the point they were able to invade China by ww2.
After world war 2 Japan continued to be heavily intertwined with the West so has advanced to the point of being our equal. But China has also opened up more, albeit very carefully, after we sided with them during the war. Since they were stunted for a long time by refusing globalism, this means they are a long way behind where they should be and are catching up and will eventually take their place as an equal as the resources they have available means they should be. This is an inevitability no matter what we do.
In the short term Japan has one of the highest debts in the world. And if you remember that article about Greece. The way you reduce debt is by increasing exports and reducing your buying power. So that is what Japan is currently doing and will do over the next decade. Past that it will continue to be a near identical country to our own.
China is increasing its manufacturing so in the short to medium term this will give us small market for mass produced goods like cheap cars and a bigger market with more money to export our high end goods to which is why we are currently able to increase the services sector. Long term is more likely to be affected by resource shortages and technology so harder to predict. If they take over our finance industries we can slowly migrate back to manufacturing which will result in a lower per capita GDP and lower wages. But since that's what you seem to be suggesting anyway(?) I don't see you having an issue with that?
Oh and just to add, while Japan has one of the highest debts in the world. It's going down and they still invest much more per person in education than our government and have far better public services and police force....
Called it!
Vin
[Corbyn] won’t ever be an enthusiastic proponent of a 2nd referendum, but he is being brought round to that position by the rest of the Labour Party, by which I mean the grassroots, who he respects more than he does the PLP.
You must log in or register to see images
You call me cynic and you think I am wording what I write deliberately to "frame" things as a question?
You didn't call anything. You just decided that me asking a question was a tactic rather than it.....just being a question.
My forecast - We are doomed unless we change. "We" meaning Europe as a whole.
Are you including all the student loans that don't get paid back by students in our government's investment?
And one would have to ask in that case, if Japan are getting so much more than us, where is all our money going? If we aren't getting as much as them despite borrowing while they get more but are paying debt off, what on earth has been going on in this country for the past 30 years?
And here, you have finally asked the correct question. The real reason behind this protest vote, and the misdirected anger toward the EU
Unfortunately, the answer is that our countries services are run terribly. Too much red tape and management in every single government run organisation (from the army to the NHS).
These are the real systemic issues, and Brexit will not change this. If anything it will make it worse, in my opinion.
Brexit is nothing but a distraction from the real issues. If anything, it’s given those d!ck’s in Westminster a 2 year reprieve from doing anything that actually matters.
The newly-independent MP Sarah Wollaston summed it up perfectly in the House a bit earlier. Referring to her earlier job as a surgeon, she pointed out that in order for a patient to give consent to a procedure, they had to know precisely what that procedure entails, along with possible outcomes and risks.You are sounding more like the political class every day "And here, you have finally asked the correct question." Sounds very similar to "let's have another referendum so that you can give us the correct answer."
In theory there is. A Labour MP earlier pointed out the number of times in history Speakers have prevented exactly the same motion being brought in more than once, let alone 3 or 4 times. If the government try and bring the same thing in next week as is rumoured, I await a procedural move to try and prevent it.Is there a limit to how many times the same proposal can be voted on? Seems crazy there is another vote next week on the same proposal that was voted down this week and earlier this year.