New stadium thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Could we just get that pub on Tottenham Court Road to sponsor the stadium? That way it would literally be named "The Tottenham Stadium"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wandering Yid
Could we just get that pub on Tottenham Court Road to sponsor the stadium? That way it would literally be named "The Tottenham Stadium"

Or that famous sports shop on Piccadilly Circus - The Lilywhites Stadium :emoticon-0103-cool:

Or perhaps not, they're owned by Sports Direct <yikes>
 
Plans for the new White Hart Lane overground station have been submitted to Haringey.

IMHO poncey facades are not the issue.

On both sides of the platforms you need a lot more space and stairs to get the
additional volume of spectators in and out. On the Love Lane side you obviously
have the space to do this. On the northbound platform this is some space down
the side but how much I don't know (I am at WHL station at the weekend) .
 
IMHO poncey facades are not the issue.

On both sides of the platforms you need a lot more space and stairs to get the
additional volume of spectators in and out. On the Love Lane side you obviously
have the space to do this. On the northbound platform this is some space down
the side but how much I don't know (I am at WHL station at the weekend) .
It's bad enough when 35k are streaming out, having 60k people will mean they need to do something drastic.
 
It's bad enough when 35k are streaming out, having 60k people will mean they need to do something drastic.

Here is the thing. If Seven Sisters is the conduit point then WHL station is moot.
Because how are they going to get the additional passengers to/from the tube to/on
the overground platforms unless Seven Sisters station itself also has major upgrades.

Perhaps the club have done travelling demographics on the current ST + mythical
waiting list, and know that the additional volume is coming from north/east of
Seven Sisters.
 
Here is the thing. If Seven Sisters is the conduit point then WHL station is moot.
Because how are they going to get the additional passengers to/from the tube to/on
the overground platforms unless Seven Sisters station itself also has major upgrades.

Perhaps the club have done travelling demographics on the current ST + mythical
waiting list, and know that the additional volume is coming from north/east of
Seven Sisters.
I go to Seven Sisters only because WHL station is so crowded. If access to that is improved, then the load might not be so bad on Seven Sisters.
 
It's bad enough when 35k are streaming out, having 60k people will mean they need to do something drastic.
I think the capacity of WHL was 57,000 when I went in the late sixties and WHL station coped reasonably well. There may be more appropriate safety limits these days of course, the platforms and trains were very crowded.
 
Here is the thing. If Seven Sisters is the conduit point then WHL station is moot.
Because how are they going to get the additional passengers to/from the tube to/on
the overground platforms unless Seven Sisters station itself also has major upgrades.

Perhaps the club have done travelling demographics on the current ST + mythical
waiting list, and know that the additional volume is coming from north/east of
Seven Sisters.
Surely it makes sense to walk to Seven Sisters if you are going to use the Victoria Line and use WHL station if you are going further south?
 
IMHO poncey facades are not the issue.

On both sides of the platforms you need a lot more space and stairs to get the
additional volume of spectators in and out. On the Love Lane side you obviously
have the space to do this. On the northbound platform this is some space down
the side but how much I don't know (I am at WHL station at the weekend) .

Full application here: http://www.planningservices.haringey.gov.uk/portal/servlets/ApplicationSearchServlet?PKID=292213

In the DAS documents the scheme claims to address the following:

• creating a new landmark station entrance on Love Lane;
• increasing the capacity of the station concourse with better circulation space for passengers;
• improving station facilities, including the introduction of a gateline to reduce ticketless travel;
• providing step-free access from the new ticket hall to each platform via two new lifts;
• providing new platform canopies in line with the new station building;
• creating a new station entrance on Penshurst Road, providing direct access between Love Lane and Penshurst Road via an unpaid link;
• improving the public realm on Love Lane to create a high quality station forecourt, providing an enhanced pedestrian environment and access to the station, including increased cycle parking provision.
 
I think the capacity of WHL was 57,000 when I went in the late sixties and WHL station coped reasonably well. There may be more appropriate safety limits these days of course, the platforms and trains were very crowded.

The coping was probably due to there being a much larger proportion of local support
(not so much far-travelling support as now) and the old trains having a lot more seats
per carriage than now.

Without knowing the potential numbers coming from where, you cannot say which
of WHL / Seven Sisters / Tottenham Hale will be the bottleneck. Ideally you would
prefer northbound tube travellers to do the Tottenham Hale + Northumberland Park
route, but you have a lot who want to go to pubs on the High Road before games.