Could we just get that pub on Tottenham Court Road to sponsor the stadium? That way it would literally be named "The Tottenham Stadium"

I quite like the idea of Apple sponsoring. We could have the i Pitch.
Would it be vastly more expensive than a normal pitch and have less features?I quite like the idea of Apple sponsoring. We could have the i Pitch.
Would it be vastly more expensive than a normal pitch and have less features?
but you could switch from Football to NFL with a swipe of the thumb and the grass would be white with grey lines of course.http://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/...ticle?blocktitle=news-feature&contentID=17135
Plans for the new White Hart Lane overground station have been submitted to Haringey.
http://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/...ticle?blocktitle=news-feature&contentID=17135
Plans for the new White Hart Lane overground station have been submitted to Haringey.
Plans for the new White Hart Lane overground station have been submitted to Haringey.
It's bad enough when 35k are streaming out, having 60k people will mean they need to do something drastic.IMHO poncey facades are not the issue.
On both sides of the platforms you need a lot more space and stairs to get the
additional volume of spectators in and out. On the Love Lane side you obviously
have the space to do this. On the northbound platform this is some space down
the side but how much I don't know (I am at WHL station at the weekend) .
It's bad enough when 35k are streaming out, having 60k people will mean they need to do something drastic.
I go to Seven Sisters only because WHL station is so crowded. If access to that is improved, then the load might not be so bad on Seven Sisters.Here is the thing. If Seven Sisters is the conduit point then WHL station is moot.
Because how are they going to get the additional passengers to/from the tube to/on
the overground platforms unless Seven Sisters station itself also has major upgrades.
Perhaps the club have done travelling demographics on the current ST + mythical
waiting list, and know that the additional volume is coming from north/east of
Seven Sisters.
I think the capacity of WHL was 57,000 when I went in the late sixties and WHL station coped reasonably well. There may be more appropriate safety limits these days of course, the platforms and trains were very crowded.It's bad enough when 35k are streaming out, having 60k people will mean they need to do something drastic.
Surely it makes sense to walk to Seven Sisters if you are going to use the Victoria Line and use WHL station if you are going further south?Here is the thing. If Seven Sisters is the conduit point then WHL station is moot.
Because how are they going to get the additional passengers to/from the tube to/on
the overground platforms unless Seven Sisters station itself also has major upgrades.
Perhaps the club have done travelling demographics on the current ST + mythical
waiting list, and know that the additional volume is coming from north/east of
Seven Sisters.
IMHO poncey facades are not the issue.
On both sides of the platforms you need a lot more space and stairs to get the
additional volume of spectators in and out. On the Love Lane side you obviously
have the space to do this. On the northbound platform this is some space down
the side but how much I don't know (I am at WHL station at the weekend) .
I think the capacity of WHL was 57,000 when I went in the late sixties and WHL station coped reasonably well. There may be more appropriate safety limits these days of course, the platforms and trains were very crowded.