First time I'm properly questioning the hierarchy. Got the exact same sinking feeling I did when Parkinson was brought in.
You interview two highly rated coaches in Swedish football who are both on the up in the game. You supposedly go after Still who is arguably the most exciting coaching prospect in football. You supposedly want progression.
But instead we appoint someone who done well in his first job until he took an interview with Wolves, turned it down then started saying all the right things in the media just to then leave 2 weeks later. He then failed in that job and was sacked and since that sacking Rangers have improved massively. Plus his record in big games is abhorrent.
I thought it was correct to move on from Mowbray but ****ing hell.
I do not get it at all.