Pathetic if it’s him like, will back him but would rather give it to Dodds
New Head Coach
- Thread starter FellTop
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
I really cant believe weve sacked Mogga whilst being in playoff contention to bring in Beale ffs.
This club never fails to suprise me.
This club never fails to suprise me.
The good feeling around the club will sharp vanish after this mind
Jesus christ , we've peddled Mowbray for Mick ****ing Beale
It's on the athletic and local journos confirming he's going to be appointed
not officially but the athletic is usually a very good source
No apparently its his brother ian instead whos more highly rated than he is
Yep. Very obviously that. He won't last a year if what my nates have told me about his time at Rangers. Rabbit in the headlights was the usual description.
What a joke of a decision. They have really read the room with that one havent they.
Absolute ****ing dogshite this man.
cheapest option would of been keeping mowbray
Sacking Mowbray was the correct decision imo. But they've put themselves massively on the back foot with this like.
It feels like weve sold Ballard and brought Flannagan back as his replacement
Last edited:
Some of the posts on here are reminiscent of when we appointed Mogga.
S
Sour Patch
Guest
First time I'm properly questioning the hierarchy. Got the exact same sinking feeling I did when Parkinson was brought in.
You interview two highly rated coaches in Swedish football who are both on the up in the game. You supposedly go after Still who is arguably the most exciting coaching prospect in football. You supposedly want progression.
But instead we appoint someone who done well in his first job until he took an interview with Wolves, turned it down then started saying all the right things in the media just to then leave 2 weeks later. He then failed in that job and was sacked and since that sacking Rangers have improved massively. Plus his record in big games is abhorrent.
I thought it was correct to move on from Mowbray but ****ing hell.
I do not get it at all.
You interview two highly rated coaches in Swedish football who are both on the up in the game. You supposedly go after Still who is arguably the most exciting coaching prospect in football. You supposedly want progression.
But instead we appoint someone who done well in his first job until he took an interview with Wolves, turned it down then started saying all the right things in the media just to then leave 2 weeks later. He then failed in that job and was sacked and since that sacking Rangers have improved massively. Plus his record in big games is abhorrent.
I thought it was correct to move on from Mowbray but ****ing hell.
I do not get it at all.
At least he had a decent pedigree and was a highly experienced Coach