Are you suggesting the council have been bribed?![]()
No I just said that Assem Allam gives money to the Labour Party and the Labour controlled Council decides the name change has nothing to do with them.
Are you suggesting the council have been bribed?![]()
So in the last few days we've had John Perscott who's been watching City back in 1950 coming out in favour of the name change and now Terry Geraghty who's been watching City since 1946 coming out against the change.
You just couldn't make it up.![]()
I doubt if Prescott was watching City in 1950 - how old was he? (10ish at a guess) He must have been a child and therefore at that time had no connection with the City of Hull. At best he may have been watching some other team who happened to be playing Hull City at the time. Is this one of those Tony Blair stories watching Jackie Milburn in non existing seats (or something like that?) Politicians lying? - surely not.
Are you suggesting the council have been bribed?![]()
To be fair to Prescott he said he saw City play Rotherham United (who he presumably supported) when he was about 11. Be interesting to see if that ties in with what was said about his growing up in his biography.
Indeed he was living in South Yorkshire at that time. He failed his 11+ in 1949 whilst living there (according to Wiki).

He'd probably fail it if he took it again now.![]()
I'd say Prescott's reason for supporting AA is far more likely to be the fact that he's a director of Hull KR and AA gave them £1m.
He's no City fan and his opinion is as irrelevant as any local rugby fan who doesn't follow City.
Geraghty is against it purely for personal reasons - he hates AA.

So we can dispense with Geraghty's ramblings. Good.
The talk around the table with my family last night was about this guy and comparisons to City.
The general consensus was that Southampton are investable and Hull isn't.
Lets face it they are spending 30m on their training ground. They own their stadium.
We have Tigers as a nickname!
He's no City fan and his opinion is as irrelevant as any local rugby fan who doesn't follow City.
Which is the tragedy in all this. When he bought the club he could have done a deal with the council (Geraghty offered him a joint venture) and developed the KC, invested in the team, developed the club's infrastructure and followed the examples of Southampton and Swansea City.
Excellent view point and one I totally share. Hence my opposition to people flaunting online polls as evidence of Hull City fans being against the name change. Glad we agree on that.
Southampton and Swansea jointly own their stadiums with their local councils and ground share with local rugby teams too?
Excellent view point and one I totally share. Hence my opposition to people flaunting online polls as evidence of Hull City fans being against the name change. Glad we agree on that.
Southampton and Swansea jointly own their stadiums with their local councils and ground share with local rugby teams too?
Were the owners of Swansea and Southampton given their stadiums for free?