Name change discussion

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
So in the last few days we've had John Perscott who's been watching City back in 1950 coming out in favour of the name change and now Terry Geraghty who's been watching City since 1946 coming out against the change.
You just couldn't make it up. <laugh>

I doubt if Prescott was watching City in 1950 - how old was he? (10ish at a guess) He must have been a child and therefore at that time had no connection with the City of Hull. At best he may have been watching some other team who happened to be playing Hull City at the time. Is this one of those Tony Blair stories watching Jackie Milburn in non existing seats (or something like that?) Politicians lying? - surely not.
 
I doubt if Prescott was watching City in 1950 - how old was he? (10ish at a guess) He must have been a child and therefore at that time had no connection with the City of Hull. At best he may have been watching some other team who happened to be playing Hull City at the time. Is this one of those Tony Blair stories watching Jackie Milburn in non existing seats (or something like that?) Politicians lying? - surely not.

To be fair to Prescott he said he saw City play Rotherham United (who he presumably supported) when he was about 11. Be interesting to see if that ties in with what was said about his growing up in his biography.
 
To be fair to Prescott he said he saw City play Rotherham United (who he presumably supported) when he was about 11. Be interesting to see if that ties in with what was said about his growing up in his biography.

Indeed he was living in South Yorkshire at that time. He failed his 11+ in 1949 whilst living there (according to Wiki).
 
The talk around the table with my family last night was about this guy and comparisons to City.

The general consensus was that Southampton are investable and Hull isn't.

Lets face it they are spending 30m on their training ground. They own their stadium.

We have Tigers as a nickname!
 
The talk around the table with my family last night was about this guy and comparisons to City.

The general consensus was that Southampton are investable and Hull isn't.

Lets face it they are spending 30m on their training ground. They own their stadium.

We have Tigers as a nickname!

Which is the tragedy in all this. When he bought the club he could have done a deal with the council (Geraghty offered him a joint venture) and developed the KC, invested in the team, developed the club's infrastructure and followed the examples of Southampton and Swansea City.
 
He's no City fan and his opinion is as irrelevant as any local rugby fan who doesn't follow City.

Excellent view point and one I totally share. Hence my opposition to people flaunting online polls as evidence of Hull City fans being against the name change. Glad we agree on that.

Which is the tragedy in all this. When he bought the club he could have done a deal with the council (Geraghty offered him a joint venture) and developed the KC, invested in the team, developed the club's infrastructure and followed the examples of Southampton and Swansea City.

Southampton and Swansea jointly own their stadiums with their local councils and ground share with local rugby teams too?
 
Excellent view point and one I totally share. Hence my opposition to people flaunting online polls as evidence of Hull City fans being against the name change. Glad we agree on that.



Southampton and Swansea jointly own their stadiums with their local councils and ground share with local rugby teams too?

Were the owners of Swansea and Southampton given their stadiums for free?
 
Excellent view point and one I totally share. Hence my opposition to people flaunting online polls as evidence of Hull City fans being against the name change. Glad we agree on that.



Southampton and Swansea jointly own their stadiums with their local councils and ground share with local rugby teams too?

Swansea's ground is owned by the council and they share it with a rugby union team.
 
Were the owners of Swansea and Southampton given their stadiums for free?

I don't know, were they? Obi's made a comparison that seemed strange, hence my questions. How could us owning the stadium jointly with the HCC, and ground sharing be the same as those 2 teams? Simple question really.

To expand on that, would HCC invest any money in the plans Dr Allam has? Would you want them to? Would the local populace want them to?