I say Alonso. He has no proper weaknesses, and I think he has gotten over 2007 but the Hamilton fans just dont agree with it, if he didnt then he would have cracked under pressure last year but he didnt.
Everyone else has atleast one proper weakness
Vettel: Cant overtake, cant race wheel to wheel.
Hamilton: Too easily pissed off and cant handle pressure at all
Button: Just not fast enough unless the car is perfect
Webber: Way too many mistakes and very inconsistant, cant save tyres.
Alonso has been known as the most complete driver for some time now, there is a reason why he is called that. The only "weakness" I can think he has is luck. I cant think of much other drivers who have won a race which has been fully wet while driving much faster than everyone else so I cant see why he is bad in the wet, but I will say he isnt the best.
PMC: Just stop ****ing arguing in every single thread. Just because someone doesnt agree with you.
Massa had many more problems in '08, (Hungary; lost 11 points to Hamilton not by his fault. Fair enough Hamilton lost out on 3) Singapore; Should have easily won the race were it not for Ferrari, lost out another 11 points to Hamilton) Dont even come up with the Spa excuse because Hamilton only lost out on 6 points. And by my calculations:
Massa: 97 + 10 (Hungary) + 10 (Singapore) - 2 (Spa) = 115
Hamilton: 98 +3 (Hungary) - 1 (Singapore) + 4 (Spa) = 104
Massa should have won.
I know it shouldnt be in this thread but I have to prove him wrong.