Very sad but it always seemed like the only sensible outcome. Wish him well in whatever he does but it would be nice to see him remain in the game, if that’s what he wants to do.
Have you seen the photograph?I'll facepalm any nonsense I like. Ta.
Have you seen the photograph?
I have seen a photograph of it. If that still was produced in court you would be serving time. Cahill, eyes closed, smashed his forehead into the side of Masons, resulting in eight fractures of the skull.

I watched it happen (as anyone can still do), it was a clash of heads, as happens in games every weekend, this one just had disastrous consequences...
You must log in or register to see media
Google the incident and look at the stills. Where the ball is, and where Cahill's head is.
If you were stood in the dock, and the prosecution produced the still I have seen, the judge would do more than ****ing face palm.Serving time
You make it sound like Cahill did it on purpose.
I watched it happen (as anyone can still do), it was a clash of heads, as happens in games every weekend, this one just had disastrous consequences...
You must log in or register to see media
If you were stood in the dock, and the prosecution produced the still I have seen, the judge would do more than ****ing face palm.
On purpose? Yes, I believe it was.
Totally agree.I've seen this clip several times and still think Cahill was reckless in his challenge, reckless but, I don't believe malicious: whenever I've heard him speak, or read anything attributed to him I've never got the impression of him being a malicious character - that being the case, I can imagine him being distraught at being responsible for finishing someone's career.
Totally agree.
Reckless - yes. I’ve said before that it’s hard to know where Cahill was intending to head the ball if he made contact with it.
Deliberate - 100% no.
Oh dear.
If you think Cahill purposely set out to hurt Mason, you're a ****ing moron, plain and simple.
**** off silly ****. He has history.
Totally agree.
Reckless - yes. I’ve said before that it’s hard to know where Cahill was going to head the ball if he made contact with it.
Deliberate - 100% no.
This. I think Cahill should have seen red. If you go in that late with your feet and injure someone that badly you'll usually see red. Just because he did it with his head should make no difference. But I can see nothing to suggest it was deliberate.
As for facing criminal procedures and the like, just no. Yes, if you produced those shots out of context in a courtroom it might result in a conviction. As would many challenges. In the context of a football match this was a player making a rubbish attempt to do something he does dozens of times a game - win the ball with his head. He got it wrong, catastrophically so. But proving intent to injure would be nigh on impossible, I'd imagine.