Mason Does One

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Very sad but it always seemed like the only sensible outcome. Wish him well in whatever he does but it would be nice to see him remain in the game, if that’s what he wants to do.
 
I have seen a photograph of it. If that still was produced in court you would be serving time. Cahill, eyes closed, smashed his forehead into the side of Masons, resulting in eight fractures of the skull.

Serving time <laugh>

You make it sound like Cahill did it on purpose.
 
It's one of those things where footballs rules make no sense and lack clarity. I mean it's clearly a dangerous thing when two people go for headers together, but it'll almost never be given as a foul and your manager and fans wouldn't be happy if you ever pulled out of one to avoid a clash of heads. We just kind of expect everything to play out OK.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amberman8
I watched it happen (as anyone can still do), it was a clash of heads, as happens in games every weekend, this one just had disastrous consequences...

You must log in or register to see media

Google the incident and look at the stills. Where the ball is, and where Cahill's head is.
 
Serving time <laugh>

You make it sound like Cahill did it on purpose.
If you were stood in the dock, and the prosecution produced the still I have seen, the judge would do more than ****ing face palm.

On purpose? Yes, I believe it was.
 
I watched it happen (as anyone can still do), it was a clash of heads, as happens in games every weekend, this one just had disastrous consequences...

You must log in or register to see media

I've seen this clip several times and still think Cahill was reckless in his challenge, reckless but, I don't believe malicious: whenever I've heard him speak, or read anything attributed to him I've never got the impression of him being a malicious character - that being the case, I can imagine him being distraught at being responsible for finishing someone's career.
 
If you were stood in the dock, and the prosecution produced the still I have seen, the judge would do more than ****ing face palm.

On purpose? Yes, I believe it was.

Oh dear.

If you think Cahill purposely set out to hurt Mason, you're a ****ing moron, plain and simple.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GlassHalfHull
I've seen this clip several times and still think Cahill was reckless in his challenge, reckless but, I don't believe malicious: whenever I've heard him speak, or read anything attributed to him I've never got the impression of him being a malicious character - that being the case, I can imagine him being distraught at being responsible for finishing someone's career.
Totally agree.

Reckless - yes. I’ve said before that it’s hard to know where Cahill was going to head the ball if he made contact with it.

Deliberate - 100% no.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RichardG
Totally agree.

Reckless - yes. I’ve said before that it’s hard to know where Cahill was intending to head the ball if he made contact with it.

Deliberate - 100% no.

I don't think it really matters. If he didn't go up to win the header or at least disrupt Mason from being free to head it clear then he's not done his job.

The problem is the game of football, which encourages the contested heading of the ball, inevitably leading to skull-on-skull collisions.
 
Totally agree.

Reckless - yes. I’ve said before that it’s hard to know where Cahill was going to head the ball if he made contact with it.

Deliberate - 100% no.

This. I think Cahill should have seen red. If you go in that late with your feet and injure someone that badly you'll usually see red. Just because he did it with his head should make no difference. But I can see nothing to suggest it was deliberate.

As for facing criminal procedures and the like, just no. Yes, if you produced those shots out of context in a courtroom it might result in a conviction. As would many challenges. In the context of a football match this was a player making a rubbish attempt to do something he does dozens of times a game - win the ball with his head. He got it wrong, catastrophically so. But proving intent to injure would be nigh on impossible, I'd imagine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: City1904
cahills a ****, just like if he'd snapped ryans leg
he probably didn't have any ill intention to it, but he's a stupid **** though
hope he comps ryan
 
This. I think Cahill should have seen red. If you go in that late with your feet and injure someone that badly you'll usually see red. Just because he did it with his head should make no difference. But I can see nothing to suggest it was deliberate.

As for facing criminal procedures and the like, just no. Yes, if you produced those shots out of context in a courtroom it might result in a conviction. As would many challenges. In the context of a football match this was a player making a rubbish attempt to do something he does dozens of times a game - win the ball with his head. He got it wrong, catastrophically so. But proving intent to injure would be nigh on impossible, I'd imagine.

We will disagree on the intent. Appreciate the reasoned reply without recourse to face palms or calling me a moron
 
  • Like
Reactions: RichardG
Some nonsense on here. Not reckless, just poor skill and timing, as happens to all players. An accident, nothing more.

Right decision to retire, all the very best to him and his family; it’s been a testing time for all of them.