I agree totally Brucey's Beak - the article is drivel and I hope that most of the last News of The Worlds tomorrow end up as fish and chip paper.
but for now im loving it
I agree totally Brucey's Beak - the article is drivel and I hope that most of the last News of The Worlds tomorrow end up as fish and chip paper.
Apart from the 90's till say a few years ago...we have always been the bigger club of the 2. It's a well known fact that most mags think they were formed in 1992 when in actual fact they were formed in 1892...
1992 was almost 20 years ago. Who gives a **** what went on that long ago? It's now completely pointless and anything prior to that is so incredibly unimportant it makes anyone who brings it up look silly. Like you right now.
OT: Sunderland will never ever come close to filling its full potential until it starts raising attendances.
This notion that you have more spending power is complete nonsense. We have a far higher turnover and have been lowering expenditure significantly over the last few years whereas you lot have increased your expenditure while your turnover has remained practically the same if not worse.
We'll see who is in the better financial position in a few years time and it won't be you unless you start making some money. Infact my guess is the **** will hit the fan unless you can somehow get into Europe or start filling your stadium whilst also raising ticket prices.
Hmm, red and whites are only spending this season what they have received from transfer fees - it's called reinvesting........
Red and whites didn't need a personal bail out of £100m from their owner to prevent them from going into administration...... and even after that, toon are about £100m in debt..............
Sorry, what was your point again? Ah yes, you're saying Sunderland should follow Toon's example and not reinvest transfer fees.....It's a pity Toon weren't prudent a good few years' earlier - they wouldn't be in the absolute financial shambles they find themselves in....
And how come they are in this mess with all those full houses over the years?
I wish them luck Mr Troll, but always remember "what goes around, comes around" ...

We aren't in a mess.
My point, again, was that you are going exactly the right way of needing a bail out in a few years, your wages keep growing and you keep spending but your revenue isn't increasing with it.
1992 was almost 20 years ago. Who gives a **** what went on that long ago? It's now completely pointless and anything prior to that is so incredibly unimportant it makes anyone who brings it up look silly. Like you right now.
I think our mates from NE1 miss the point, the facts in the article are not important its how they, the great unwashed, are getting so hot and bothered about an article that they say is not bothering them.
Best read for a long time, may print it out and frame it.