Mafia 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
ok then... if stirring is what they want sure.... if they were really up to that you'd have been picked though... #mafia?

I wan IBWt left up there just cos. I'd rather he was than he is not. If its a 4 wya its 25% risk of lynching a guy who would die anyway... if the rule is that way.. compared to letting him off the hook.

Nobody will pick me because I'm too risky (always in the limelight when it comes to voting)
 
meh.... only if nobody forcuses on the vote table.

gerrez you have gone to "work" i presume that means you are having a ****.... you still have not changed your vote. why not. it seems pointless right now. just saying....

Didn't know I was meant to be changing my vote :huh:

However, if i was, I'm not. Not yet anyway. I want to hear from Sky first.


PS...I posted the bit from the OP whilst ****ting :)
 
Didn't know I was meant to be changing my vote :huh:

However, if i was, I'm not. Not yet anyway. I want to hear from Sky first.

well seeing thats your reason ok.

we were discussing getting lads on 3 votes due to risk of unknown rules meaning sky could be at risk but how and ever. you've a vote on brb which is fine but its one vote and does nothing right now.
 
Didn't know I was meant to be changing my vote :huh:

However, if i was, I'm not. Not yet anyway. I want to hear from Sky first.

What do you expect Sky to tell you? Unless there are any special unknown rules, he'll be as clueless as the rest of us.
 
What do you expect Sky to tell you? Unless there are any special unknown rules, he'll be as clueless as the rest of us.

that is a good point though maybe sky does have more secret rules he might have but if they all relate to what occurs tonight why would he tell us now?
 
What do you expect Sky to tell you? Unless there are any special unknown rules, he'll be as clueless as the rest of us.

We know he is a innocent and he definitely won't be applying Mafia influence. I think he should be the one guiding us in our actions.

For example, if we want a four way, Sky could tell us all who to vote for individually. anyone falling out of line is guilty.


that is a good point though maybe sky does have more secret rules he might have but if they all relate to what occurs tonight why would he tell us now?

Not bothered whether he has or not. He is the only one I trust ATM
 
We know he is a innocent and he definitely won't be applying Mafia influence. I think he should be the one guiding us in our actions.

For example, if we want a four way, Sky could tell us all who to vote for individually. anyone falling out of line is guilty.

he could 2 days from now but surely he can't yet. we need to get him to the point where he can.
 
he could 2 days from now but surely he can't yet. we need to get him to the point where he can.

Why couldn't he? We basically know nothing and are randomly picking people to put in a coin toss. The people influencing who those will be include Mafia members. Sky is the ONLY known innocent so let him choose and tell us who votes for who. Let him dictate (if he's on in time).

He can take whats been said already into account too.
 
Why couldn't he? We basically know nothing and are randomly picking people to put in a coin toss. The people influencing who those will be include Mafia members. Sky is the ONLY known innocent so let him choose and tell us who votes for who. Let him dictate (if he's on in time).

He can take whats been said already into account too.

It's an idea. Not sure it's a good one, but it's an idea.
 
It's an idea. Not sure it's a good one, but it's an idea.

Feel free to suggest another idea that eliminates Mafia influence <ok>

As far as I'm concerned, anyone against adapting this (or a similar approach) must be considered potentially guilty.
 
Why couldn't he? We basically know nothing and are randomly picking people to put in a coin toss. The people influencing who those will be include Mafia members. Sky is the ONLY known innocent so let him choose and tell us who votes for who. Let him dictate (if he's on in time).

He can take whats been said already into account too.

an idea... but a bad one on day 1.

you are basically now putting all our eggs with sky and even though we know its fine what you are saying is lets all ignore whatever gut feelings etc and ask him to either pick one out of 15... which we don't know if he knows anything or at best 4 people himself.

what if he picks you for a joke <laugh>

we've two masons who's options then are limited and the mafia can simply get in line especially if it has a lower risk to them and simply follow along and we get nowhere. should he tell the journo and detective what to do as well? the vigilante?

If we are both here day 3 and you are suggesting this I'd be in agreement to try and at least get someone to get behind and use their info at that point.



We'll see when he gets on what he's got to say.
 
Feel free to suggest another idea that eliminates Mafia influence <ok>

As far as I'm concerned, anyone against adapting this (or a similar approach) must be considered potentially guilty.

Do you mean adopting?

Does it eliminate mafia influence though? Sure, Sky's innocent and would presumably act as such, but I would assume his instructions would be based on what he thinks having read the thead (or some of it at least)., so his thinking may be influenced by what the mafia say (same as anybody's). And all the mafia have to do to remain hidden is go along with the plan. It may put pressure on, it may not. But we could be just as well served by doing a random selection of votes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.