If 'Pool are still in a relegation struggle at Xmas, should Roy Rodgers change tack?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoddle is a god
  • Start date Start date
  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
It doesn't matter a maggots ejaculation who thinks we are a big,medium or small club does it because the OFFICIAL guide tells us we are 12h biggest so pee off the lot of you,we are laughing at you. We are top four and 12th biggest...OFFICIAL.
 
​
Spurm said:
is it me or is are WUMs getting worse? Or is it just education in general?
Click to expand...

Indeed. One is normally used to a far better class of Wum on this site, than this idiot. The more infantile ones, such as him, normally gravitate to ja606. Myself, I do appreciate a bit more of a challenge than this child presents.
 
I still think that if, come Xmas, 'Pool are still at the foot of the table, their Yank owner would do well to sack Rodgers, get Carroll back from the Spanners, and appoint Big Sam to employ his hoofball tactics in a desperate last gasp to avoid the drop.

It won't be pretty, and it won't be the 'Pool "way" but at least it would give them a chance of one more season in top-flight football.

I know I'll probably get wummed for suggestion this by the Mousers, but please do try not to shoot the messenger. This is a discussion board, after all.
 
Hoddle Is A God said:
I still think that if, come Xmas, 'Pool are still at the foot of the table, their Yank owner would do well to sack Rodgers, get Carroll back from the Spanners, and appoint Big Sam to employ his hoofball tactics in a desperate last gasp to avoid the drop.

It won't be pretty, and it won't be the 'Pool "way" but at least it would give them a chance of one more season in top-flight football.

I know I'll probably get wummed for suggestion this by the Mousers, but please do try not to shoot the messenger. This is a discussion board, after all.
Click to expand...

<laugh>

In all seriousness though I do agree with you to a lesser extent. There is no way Liverpool have the players to play teams off the park. I reckon the following teams:

Arsenal
Chelsea
City
United
Everton
Spurs
WBA
Fulham
Newcastle
Swansea
Wigan
QPR
Southampton

Pretty much all have technically superior midfields. So for certain only Stoke, West Ham, Villa and Reading are technically inferior to them.

With Drogba gone, Carroll IMO is now the best aerial threat bar none and if Liverpool were to play to his strengths and build the team around him rather than Suarez I reckon they'd fair much better. I've never thought Carroll was as bad as people make out myself.
 
District Line said:
<laugh>

In all seriousness though I do agree with you to a lesser extent. There is no way Liverpool have the players to play teams off the park. I reckon the following teams:

Arsenal
Chelsea
City
United
Everton
Spurs
WBA
Fulham
Newcastle
Swansea
Wigan
QPR
Southampton

Pretty much all have technically superior midfields. So for certain only Stoke, West Ham, Villa and Reading are technically inferior to them.

With Drogba gone, Carroll IMO is now the best aerial threat bar none and if Liverpool were to play to his strengths and build the team around him rather than Suarez I reckon they'd fair much better. I've never thought Carroll was as bad as people make out myself.
Click to expand...

I really, really hope you're joking <laugh>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back