I think the interference in this scenario more comes with Acun constantly taking a different course of how he wants to play things over his ownership.
Until Summer 2023 - we were scattergun. Hiring an unknown manager and signing players based on reputation and abilities in leagues that weren't that compatible with the Championship.
I don't think its a coincidence that our best transfer window arguably came along when we had a manager that stabilised the team - and we had a bit of continuity during the off season in 2023. We signed some duds then, as we have every window - but the ones that came in that window on the whole had a positive impact on the following season.
January 2024 and we chucked money at it at the wrong time. Plenty were saying that at the time and its still a little unclear as to whether that influence was the manager or the owner/recruitment team. Regardless - it backfired.
Since then we've lurched between two managers that are unknown quantities in the league and the transfers have become fairly scattergun again - with no real coherent plan as to how we move forward other than trying to save the season in this January transfer window.
I don't think its a coincidence that the clubs without parachute payments that do well in the league are usually ones that play a long term game when it comes to how they move forward. Its something we've lacked throughout Acun's tenure and that can only come down to his interference in the club and how he wants to run it or who he's listening to. Either way - the buck stops with him and I'd rather what ever happens at the end of this season we try and salvage some form of continuity.
The last paragraph rings incredibly true. Coventry and Bristol City and the models to follow. Selling a player every summer and reinvesting. Slowly building a squad and adding bits of quality in consecutive windows rather than having 60 players being signed over 3 seasons
