Goalkeepers

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
PLT said:
It's just what I've said already. There are several signs now that Walter wants certain things from his keepers which is why he brought Rushworth in and I want him to have what he wants in order to be successful. I think our goalkeeping situation is peculiar in that Pandur has become the incumbent as a result of being here for pre-season while the others weren't, and now injury to Rushworth just when he was finally going to start. If he decides that Pandur is still the best available option then that's fine with me, but I think it's worth discussing that he might not.
Click to expand...
Where was it stated that Rushworth was going to start.
 
PLT said:
It's just what I've said already. There are several signs now that Walter wants certain things from his keepers which is why he brought Rushworth in and I want him to have what he wants in order to be successful. I think our goalkeeping situation is peculiar in that Pandur has become the incumbent as a result of being here for pre-season while the others weren't, and now injury to Rushworth just when he was finally going to start. If he decides that Pandur is still the best available option then that's fine with me, but I think it's worth discussing that he might not.
Click to expand...
And he’s had plenty of games he could have picked rushworth but hasn’t
And as for trying Racc! WTF

and i don’t know where this he was due to start has come from?
Pandurs number 1 he’s ours
End of chat
 
  • Like
Reactions: mazzer and Howdentiger2
Howdentiger2 said:
Pandur has become the "incumbent" as you put it because he took his chance and proved to everyone he's a top quality GK who is totally and completely deserving of his starting place and position as our #1

There is absolutely zero need or reason to change that.
Click to expand...

It would be a very brave or foolish man to drop pandur now he's in form. Oddly enough I don't think he got a mention in the Sunderland mom thread which shows we are getting better, if you see what I mean.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjo, TIGERSCAVE, springtiger and 2 others
Howdentiger2 said:
There is absolutely zero need or reason to change that.
Click to expand...
There is of course a reason to change that, to improve our playing out from the back. You might not think that's sufficient reason, but it is a reason. However if you repeat your view that there is zero reason, but this time add FACT, then I'll concede the point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PLT
jhe10 said:
There is of course a reason to change that, to improve our playing out from the back. You might not think that's sufficient reason, but it is a reason. However if you repeat your view that there is zero reason, but this time add FACT, then I'll concede the point.
Click to expand...

So we should have dropped the keeper in piss poor form last season then....I'm sure you was one of the ones dead against that. Care to explain the difference?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chazz Rheinhold
I wonder if we avoid Rushworth’s rumoured non-appearance fee if he’s out injured?
 
Howdentiger2 said:
So we should have dropped the keeper in piss poor form last season then....I'm sure you was one of the ones dead against that. Care to explain the difference?
Click to expand...

You seem to be angrily responding to posts without really taking in what they're saying. If he indeed was against dropping Allsop last season, that in no way contradicts what he's said in the post you quoted.

It's just a discussion about player selection, really no reason for it to become so confrontational.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newland Tiger
jhe10 said:
There is of course a reason to change that, to improve our playing out from the back. You might not think that's sufficient reason, but it is a reason. However if you repeat your view that there is zero reason, but this time add FACT, then I'll concede the point.
Click to expand...

I think we need to improve our playing back from the front.

The keeper isn’t the problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howdentiger2
PLT said:
You seem to be angrily responding to posts without really taking in what they're saying. If he indeed was against dropping Allsop last season, that in no way contradicts what he's said in the post you quoted.

It's just a discussion about player selection, really no reason for it to become so confrontational.
Click to expand...
To be fair to him, I can explain the point (again) to HT2 but I can't make him understand it.
 
jhe10 said:
To be fair to him, I can explain the point (again) to HT2 but I can't make him understand it.
Click to expand...

Explain it as many times as you want to, still doesn't change the fact that changing the GK is an absolutely stupid thing to do ATM and the people who seem keen to see it happen are either a tad dim or don't understand the role of a GK fully and what Pandur is bringing to the team ATM, plus in some instances total hypocrites.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalman II and Deano's Volley
PLT said:
You seem to be angrily responding to posts without really taking in what they're saying. If he indeed was against dropping Allsop last season, that in no way contradicts what he's said in the post you quoted.

It's just a discussion about player selection, really no reason for it to become so confrontational.
Click to expand...

If you think that's angry and confrontational then you really need to get out more. Or are you just one of these people the default straight to that when someone doesn't agree with your POV?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SW3 Chelsea Tiger, Cityzen, mazzer and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back