Goalkeepers

Where was it stated that Rushworth was going to start.

 

It was the Sky Sports journalist who also reported his injury. Pete something.

 

Never heard of mr something

 

And he’s had plenty of games he could have picked rushworth but hasn’t
And as for trying Racc! WTF

and i don’t know where this he was due to start has come from?
Pandurs number 1 he’s ours
End of chat

 

It would be a very brave or foolish man to drop pandur now he's in form. Oddly enough I don't think he got a mention in the Sunderland mom thread which shows we are getting better, if you see what I mean.

 

He does have a dodgy hair style.Is that a good enough reason.

 

Peter Dork

 

Wasn’t he in the Monkees?

 

Quite possibly, know the name from somewhere

 

There is of course a reason to change that, to improve our playing out from the back. You might not think that's sufficient reason, but it is a reason. However if you repeat your view that there is zero reason, but this time add FACT, then I'll concede the point.

 

would imagine with 10 games out, taking us up to Xmas that he'll prob head back in Jan in search of a better loan

 

So we should have dropped the keeper in piss poor form last season then....I'm sure you was one of the ones dead against that. Care to explain the difference?

 

I wonder if we avoid Rushworth’s rumoured non-appearance fee if he’s out injured?

 

We will do yes ( if there even is a penalty). You can't be penalised for not playing an injured player.

 

You seem to be angrily responding to posts without really taking in what they're saying. If he indeed was against dropping Allsop last season, that in no way contradicts what he's said in the post you quoted.

It's just a discussion about player selection, really no reason for it to become so confrontational.

 

I think we need to improve our playing back from the front.

The keeper isn’t the problem.

 

Its a bit like the Sanity Clause, which would be invoked reading some threads on this forum!

 

To be fair to him, I can explain the point (again) to HT2 but I can't make him understand it.

 

Explain it as many times as you want to, still doesn't change the fact that changing the GK is an absolutely stupid thing to do ATM and the people who seem keen to see it happen are either a tad dim or don't understand the role of a GK fully and what Pandur is bringing to the team ATM, plus in some instances total hypocrites.

 

If you think that's angry and confrontational then you really need to get out more. Or are you just one of these people the default straight to that when someone doesn't agree with your POV?