Gary Monk

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Tony Angelino

Tony Angelino

Well-Known Member
Aug 10, 2011
8,596
5,002
113
Peckham
Apparentley was at the Bolton game and a home game over the last few weeks
Anyone see him or heard anything?

i'll now put my tin hat on and wait for the keyboard warriors to dissect my question and turn it into something it isnt which in turn will start a thred of arguing and ****e :)
 
Geo10 said:
Apparentley was at the Bolton game and a home game over the last few weeks
Anyone see him or heard anything?

i'll now put my tin hat on and wait for the keyboard warriors to dissect my question and turn it into something it isnt which in turn will start a thred of arguing and ****e :)
Click to expand...

You must log in or register to see images


Can I be the first?!

I'd like Monk to be fair.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tony Angelino
3rd time I've heard this now. The first was Hudders away, he was adamant Monk was going to be in charge next year.
 
I mentioned Monk the moment he became available. We should have sacked Bruce there and then.

We should have done the same when Sherwood became available, both times.

I said we should have sacked Bruce in 2012.
 
MagicSponge said:
3rd time I've heard this now. The first was Hudders away, he was adamant Monk was going to be in charge next year.
Click to expand...
Him or sherwood for me, im sure both feel they have a bit to prove. It will depend what our situation is and if the powers that be have any interest
 
Geo10 said:
Him or sherwood for me, im sure both feel they have a bit to prove. It will depend what our situation is and if the powers that be have any interest
Click to expand...

I dont think there is any debate whatsoever that Villa wouldnt be as bad as they are now if they'd kept Sherwood.

Might have still gone down, but it wouldnt have been with a whimper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tony Angelino
Geo10 said:
Him or sherwood for me, im sure both feel they have a bit to prove. It will depend what our situation is and if the powers that be have any interest
Click to expand...

They both have something to prove because they got sacked for not winning enough.
 
lakesideview said:
So lets give the managers job to one of two people who both got sacked for not winning enough. Yeah I see the logic in that.
Click to expand...

Almost every manager gets sacked at some point. Those two are both excellent managers though, so for us to pretend they aren't good enough for City is daft.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back