The ****ing evidence is there man. You won’t criticise him, but claim “if any interested parties exist”, yet he himself has said there were 5 just a couple of weeks ago. I remember you on the SMB saying the same time and time again, it’s not worth conversing with you because you completely ignore the points put in front of you. If you cared to read my post, you claimed he would sell for a profit, businessman won’t want to pay a profit because he hasn’t done anything to deserve it, ergo he is asking too much as far as they are concerned. You won’t have a go at a bloke who introduced new owners to the staff, cannot sell the club despite having 5 interested parties and had two failed takeovers last year. The whole board is made up of guesswork man, no one will know all of the facts, but some are bright enough to read between the lines. Others, well they bury their head and cover themselves in tinfoil. If all we had to talk about was facts, it would be a pretty **** message board. Most people can make reasoned judgment on the evidence put in front of them, even a civil court works on the balance of probability. Which in this case is stacked heavily against Stewart Donald.
Picking the old madness baton back up there then.