The absolute best one I've seen.
You must log in or register to see media
Like the xylophone and double bass in the background. Who's the blond bloke that keeps coming on screen.?
The absolute best one I've seen.
You must log in or register to see media
Good luck, mate - jet-lag's a bitch ....... I once fell asleep in a restaurant in Sydney in the middle of a conversation ......
Could have been worse Dave, you could have been talking to someone and they fell asleep.Good luck, mate - jet-lag's a bitch ....... I once fell asleep in a restaurant in Sydney in the middle of a conversation ......
My face hit a full plate of spaghetti once because of bad jet-lag. It all caught up with me, and eating can be delightfully soporific. Usually, afterwards, not during.![]()
Could have been worse Dave, you could have been talking to someone and they fell asleep.
Yep... I looked that word up. Today's new word for me![]()
The Sun being the Sun today, I see:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/foot...with-academy-chief-les-reed-over-saints-kids/
I did warn they were being their usual selves.What an awful article. I don't see how the club can be criticised whatsoever.
If we take a massive step backwards in performances, then the club will have to accept criticism, but until that time, articles like this are toilet paper.
The Sun being the Sun today, I see:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/foot...with-academy-chief-les-reed-over-saints-kids/
TBF, this article matches the facts as well...just fed from the other side. What it comes down to is that all was not well with a major difference between the two parties. If true, Koeman leaving and us getting compo can only be good for Saints as our future is tied to Reed and not Ron. And doesn't affect the fact that RK lied through his teeth. Before you knock the article completely, you should read one of the bits from the middle of the article; hardly anti-Saints is it?
Southampton, who won seven of their last nine games, are an upwardly mobile outfit.
Everton? They are hanging on to history, still talking about the glory days of Sheedy, Reid, Bracewell, Ratcliffe and Kendall in the mid-80s.
Farhad Moshiri, the club’s new investor, will no doubt give Koeman money to spend, but nobody can say that Goodison Park is stable.
Koeman has walked away from a good thing.
Perhaps that is true...if the journalist has been fed facts from someone on Koeman's side. The higher figure quoted may be to do with add ons and bonuses.Not sure where he got the £3m a year from though...
TBF, this article matches the facts as well...just fed from the other side. What it comes down to is that all was not well with a major difference between the two parties. If true, Koeman leaving and us getting compo can only be good for Saints as our future is tied to Reed and not Ron. And doesn't affect the fact that RK lied through his teeth. Before you knock the article completely, you should read one of the bits from the middle of the article; hardly anti-Saints is it?
Southampton, who won seven of their last nine games, are an upwardly mobile outfit.
Everton? They are hanging on to history, still talking about the glory days of Sheedy, Reid, Bracewell, Ratcliffe and Kendall in the mid-80s.
Farhad Moshiri, the club’s new investor, will no doubt give Koeman money to spend, but nobody can say that Goodison Park is stable.
Koeman has walked away from a good thing.
Not sure where he got the £3m a year from though...
They may have been trying to suggest that Koeman left over a difference of principle...because he went for not much more money and to a possibly tougher job. However, that is not clear which, as you say, makes it badly written. This is the curse of the cut and paste generation of journalists. They can change the start of an article then post it without rewriting the piece. How often have you read a bit about a match where the start of the report contradicts the end...because it was altered as the journalist went along, but no one did any proof reading.I found the article confusing. It started off by criticising Saints and finished with the bit you posted. Seems badly written to me.
They may have been trying to suggest that Koeman left over a difference of principle...because he went for not much more money and to a possibly tougher job. However, that is not clear which, as you say, makes it badly written. This is the curse of the cut and paste generation of journalists. They can change the start of an article then post it without rewriting the piece. How often have you read a bit about a match where the start of the report contradicts the end...because it was altered as the journalist went along, but no one did any proof reading.