Don't correct me then produce this. ^Oh, yes it did! But please enlighten me ... What did I miss? Tell me, NOW, or I'll pick on you next! Not.
Don't correct me then produce this. ^Oh, yes it did! But please enlighten me ... What did I miss? Tell me, NOW, or I'll pick on you next! Not.
I used an incorrect plural.Looked ok to me but then again i got the IQ of a flip flop.
I used an incorrect plural.
I only know pleurisy.
'Neither use of those commas is correct.' Although it's certainly not a construct I would ever use, I cannot for the life of me see what you're talking about. Pleeease, pretty please with (k)nobs on, enlighten me. Are there some asterisks, or even asterixes, missing? Not that I'm obsessive or owt, like.You obviously found the bug, so you should be able to find the bad/misleading use of English in your corrected version of the sentence in question.
I googled how to spell that.
I can't see any other issues with the correction.'Neither use of those commas is correct.' Although it's certainly not a construct I would ever use, I cannot for the life of me see what you're talking about. Pleeease, pretty please with (k)nobs on, enlighten me. Are there some asterisks, or even asterixes, missing? Not that I'm obsessive or owt, like.
I can't see any other issues with the correction.
You're just fishing for likes now.Oh come even i can see the issue.
You're just fishing for likes now.![]()
Perhaps he should bid for players that might want to play for them? They bid, the player said no, he hardly wasted their time.
In GLP's original post there were two commas used. Each was in a separate sentence. Both commas were unnecessary. That bit Cortez picked up on and made a statement.'Neither use of those commas is correct.' Although it's certainly not a construct I would ever use, I cannot for the life of me see what you're talking about. Pleeease, pretty please with (k)nobs on, enlighten me. Are there some asterisks, or even asterixes, missing? Not that I'm obsessive or owt, like.
In GLP's original post there were two commas used. Each was in a separate sentence. Both commas were unnecessary. That bit Cortez picked up on and made a statement.
Your correction to Cortez's sentence should have been either:
a) Neither use of the comma is correct
or
b) The use of those commas is incorrect.
or
c) Those commas are Bollox.
NOT "Neither use of those commas is correct.", because two adjacent commas were not used.
Brilliant name. He is only 5 ft 11 so that's fairly short for a keeper. Let's sign Olie The Goalie, it's also a brilliant name.I think Bruce is looking for a keeper,what about this guy he is an international Sinthaweechai Hathairattanakool
i would not pay for the name on a shirt but i could use his first 3 letters and have Sin and the other guy on here could have first three letters of last name HatBrilliant name. He is only 5 ft 11 so that's fairly short for a keeper. Let's sign Olie The Goalie, it's also a brilliant name.
Brilliant name. He is only 5 ft 11 so that's fairly short for a keeper. Let's sign Olie The Goalie, it's also a brilliant name.
That would be hilarious. He was an amazing keeper, played forever for us, even fought the other goalie once who was the best man at his wedding. He was a lot like Dawson for us in that respect, gave his all for the club and basically his entire career. Just the type of player that we should be looking to sign, someone young who is incredibly loyal.We could start a group small goals till i die,try to help him out a bit?.
He'd need to be his own agent in that case.That would be hilarious. He was an amazing keeper, played forever for us, even fought the other goalie once who was the best man at his wedding. He was a lot like Dawson for us in that respect, gave his all for the club and basically his entire career. Just the type of player that we should be looking to sign, someone young who is incredibly loyal.