I think I must be missing something here ? If anyone can explain ?
1) The Allams may/may not want to sell to get their investment back ? Either way, promotion is the way ?
2) Being a top flight club would maximize the possibility/probability of finding a buyer. Much longer time-frame to recoup their investment if languishing in the Championship, or worse ? I doubt they want to make a loss on their injections ( loans or otherwise).
3) Retaining the core players (Dawson, Chester,Brady, Elmo., Robertson, Hudds(?)) and recruiting additional strength who would have an impact in the Championship to get us up (keeper, creative midfielder, striker or two) would seem the right strategy. Everyone seems to be saying this on here - Bruce too.
I don't understand this budget debate, unless it has something to do with this FFP thing & the 40-50 % salary reductions in place & keeping hold of existing players cannot meet the required regulations . Does anyone know the true situation ? Could we not keep e.g Jelly & N'Doye to blast us back up ? Surely if we can't offload the high earners, could we not offer them incentives for next season for getting us up to circumvent FFP restrictions ( deferred compensation) ?
I don't believe any professional player would consciously not try their best...it is not in their best long-term career interests.
Set up a Plan B (line up close-to-certain replacements for those high earners "earmaked" for off-loading ( high earners or so-called ineffective players- strikers in the main - who may be "superstars" in the Championship).
Unless it contravenes FFP rules, the Allams really should throw some money at this. How restricted are they ?