Beware New Owners

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
For me he is the worst owner in our entire history. Even David Llord didnt threaten to extinct Hull City, he was happy to let us exist as olong as he got paid.



I agree, that's why I'm boycotting home games. I personally can't oppose the owner and then turn up to home games. It's contradictory in my eyes but that's just me, i wont criticise others who still go.

Respect. I disagree but I do respect your position.
 
If he's the worst owner ever, and the worst in football, how come CTWD allegedly want him to stay?

Because people have different opinions. I dont agree with CTWD's stance, for me it's time for him to go. I cant think how anyone could actually do a worse job than he has. The same people who made Bartlett public enemy number 1 for putting us on the brink of financial collapse seem to be quiet about Allam putting us in 300% more debt.
 
Because people have different opinions. I dont agree with CTWD's stance, for me it's time for him to go. I cant think how anyone could actually do a worse job than he has. The same people who made Bartlett public enemy number 1 for putting us on the brink of financial collapse seem to be quiet about Allam putting us in 300% more debt.

The difference is, under the Allams our finances are manageable, and have a long term goal of being profitable.
 
The difference is, under the Allams our finances are manageable, and have a long term goal of being profitable.

I dont see how they are manageable at all. And I'm pretty sure Bartlett had a long term goal of being profitable. The problem was we got relegated.
 
I dont see how they are manageable at all. And I'm pretty sure Bartlett had a long term goal of being profitable. The problem was we got relegated.

Bartletts long term goal was for him to be profitable. I understand why it's difficult to understand, we're not expected to think like this and we're naturally suspicious of anyone rich but Assems long term goal is for the club to be successful.
 
That's a stupid point. Isn't EVERY chairman's long term goal for their club to be successful and profitable?

Which chairman ever wanted failure and debt?
 
Happy Tiger:7078486 said:
I dont see how they are manageable at all. And I'm pretty sure Bartlett had a long term goal of being profitable. The problem was we got relegated.

Bartletts long term goal was for him to be profitable. I understand why it's difficult to understand, we're not expected to think like this and we're naturally suspicious of anyone rich but Assems long term goal is for the club to be successful.

Bartlett had the same aim but found out he and Duffen were **** at running football clubs. Allam has the same problem.
 
That's why there were boos really. Because CTWD is now unofficially anti-allam.

Erm....no they're not, they're officially and unofficially not anti-Allam.

They think he's a bit of a lunatic, but fundamentally only disagree with him on the name change and his daft fall out with the council.
 
Bum_Chinned_Crab:7075774 said:
If he's the worst owner ever, and the worst in football, how come CTWD allegedly want him to stay?

Because people have different opinions. I dont agree with CTWD's stance, for me it's time for him to go. I cant think how anyone could actually do a worse job than he has. The same people who made Bartlett public enemy number 1 for putting us on the brink of financial collapse seem to be quiet about Allam putting us in 300% more debt.

Agree.

Allam is doing this out of pig handedness and spite. The others where just bad at there job and out there depths.
 
That's a stupid point. Isn't EVERY chairman's long term goal for their club to be successful and profitable?

Which chairman ever wanted failure and debt?

Thanks for proving my point. I had a funny feeling you'd be one who wouldn't understand.

Let me make it easier for you. Some chairmen do it to make themselves, personally, richer. Or in Bartletts case try and fail (relatively, as I suspect that he did ok). Some do it for the benefit of the club. Yes Dr Allam is making money on interest payments but he had to risk his own cash to do that.

Totally different approaches. Hopefully that's clearer for you.
 
Thanks for proving my point. I had a funny feeling you'd be one who wouldn't understand.

Let me make it easier for you. Some chairmen do it to make themselves, personally, richer. Or in Bartletts case try and fail (relatively, as I suspect that he did ok). Some do it for the benefit of the club. Yes Dr Allam is making money on interest payments but he had to risk his own cash to do that.

Totally different approaches. Hopefully that's clearer for you.

I hate to smash your halo of superiority, but the only way a chairman can generate a personal profit for himself is for his club to be successful and profit-making in the first place.

Obviously.
 
Thanks for proving my point. I had a funny feeling you'd be one who wouldn't understand.

Let me make it easier for you. Some chairmen do it to make themselves, personally, richer. Or in Bartletts case try and fail (relatively, as I suspect that he did ok). Some do it for the benefit of the club. Yes Dr Allam is making money on interest payments but he had to risk his own cash to do that.

Totally different approaches. Hopefully that's clearer for you.

Hardly anybody, ever makes money out of being a football club owner. Of course there are exceptions, but they are precisely that - exceptions. It is often described as the surest way to lose a fortune.

I hate to smash your halo of superiority, but the only way a chairman can generate a personal profit for himself is for his club to be successful and profit-making in the first place.

Obviously.

And what he said.
 
The bit that did it for me was in Mr Allams latest speach

IF I DONT GET THE NAME CHANGE I AM LEAVING

If he cared that much about the club he would STAY

so let him go

Big deal

IF HE ACTUALY CARED THAT MUCH HE WOULD NEVER HAVE MADE THAT THREAT TO EVERY SUPPORTER OF THE CLUB INCLUDING HIS OWN SUPPORTERS WHO BACK HIM