Nobody ever mentions how only 1 - 3% of the population are gay, yet boys make up a third of all peadophile victims.
That's the elephant in the room folks!
That's the elephant in the room folks!
Off Topic Barry Bennell
- Thread starter Chazz Rheinhold
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
So you agree with Bristow, that the "allegedly" abused footballers, who were basically kids or young teenagers at the time, were not later or now "real men", notwithstanding the possible trauma/damage they suffered from their experiences, and the "stigma/additional trauma" they may well have suffered, from their parents, public opinion or indeed from the potential impact on their career aspirations for not retaliating in the way Bristow insinuated ? Is that a pc phenomenon ?
~Not sure where you get your figures from. Back in the 80's they believed 10% were gay.
What connection or relevance is there between those figures?
Do you believe it's 10%?
Have you ever given it any thought?
Ever questioned the narrative?
The study you mention that gave that ridiculous 10% figure was conducted in a US state penitentiary by - i forget who now.
So yes whilst the cons were doing time, 1 in ten of them engaged in homosexual activity.
Of course this was then pushed by the (((you know who's))) as an representation of society as a whole. A big gaping whole if most of the posters on here had their way!
Have you ever given it any thought?
Ever questioned the narrative?
The study you mention that gave that ridiculous 10% figure was conducted in a US state penitentiary by - i forget who now.
So yes whilst the cons were doing time, 1 in ten of them engaged in homosexual activity.
Of course this was then pushed by the (((you know who's))) as an representation of society as a whole. A big gaping whole if most of the posters on here had their way!
No, of course not, you mischievous, wannabe troublemaker. You are either that, or just another screwball; probably the latter, based on a quick scan of your recent efforts. You are certainly not the only screwball on here. I suggest you just put me on 'ignore'; I won't be wasting any more of my precious time on a flagrant nutter like you.
To clarify again, for the final time: I agree with Bristow's stated wish to severely damage the subhuman filth that performed the abhorrent actions in question. You, however, are, again, following your typical (sole?) tactic of deliberately misinterpreting certain words in a football forum and making a pathetic attempt to launch your own version of an online WWIII. Whoopee frickin' doo.
One thing is for sure; you are irrecoverably far from my definition of a real man (ibid.). Now, go forth and multiply, you wet pussy. You may use this statement in evidence against me, if you wish. And you probably will. Rock on, fearless keyboard warrior. Oh well.
How's the weather up there? We're getting your polar vortex here. Thang you. Thang you very much.
"You may use this statement in evidence against me, if you wish. And you probably will"
Not worth the effort, it's in the public domain already. Others will judge. What a strange "real" man you are. Wonder why Bristow's no longer with Sky ? He seems as dumb or misinformed as you. Take your pick.
Relish your precious time. Doubt I deliberately misinterpret words on here. More likely misunderstand or misspell...
As in screwball...
You must log in or register to see media
Lovely. May your dog go with you. Screwball.
Goodnight and goodbye, pillock!
There is a lot of that, anti elitism etc
However there is also a rising right wing too
Similar reasons maybe, or at least similar rhetoric being used to further both groups (there is some cross over, but not completely at all)
Government estimates are 5% LGBT, but there's no definitive data (it was in a work report yesterday funnily enough)
Government estimates 5% LGBT actually, although there is no definitive data
However that is completely irrelevant as the two things you mention are unrelated pieces of information
Very well put. To not be able to appreciate this viewpoint is truly mind-boggling.
I never understand why Transgender is included in this arbitrary group. It's got nothing to do with sexuality.
It was, but they government assume understatement for some reason so as far as I know estimate at 5%
Having said that I never trust stats that happen to be nice round numbers! So your figure is probably more accurate
Either way it was completely irrelevant to the point about *****philes