Newcastle and Southampton fans warned us, which 2 clubs would be in a better position to judge?
It would depend on circumstance, I certainly wouldn't assume that because we signed someone who play's for Uruguay that we should disregard those who got us where we were.
No, he wasn't good for a season, he was good for about 3 months, until the Fulham game, after that he's varied from average to ****e. Once more, Quinn has been more effective that Huddlestone for around 18 months.
It isn't an exaggeration at all. I would say Diame was our best midfielder but he's crocked, and Bruce has said as soon as he isn't he'll be gone. Therefore, I firmly believe Quinn was realistically our best midfielder.