Match Day Thread Special Match Preview: Sunderland AFC Vs Newcastle United

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Outcome


  • Total voters
    26
  • Poll closed .
They don't even get to debate whether or not they think it is a penalty - just whether it is an obvious mistake. Even if they thought it wasn't a penalty I don't think they could say it was a clear mistake which is why I agree it must be down to thinking it's not a goalscoring opportunity.




They aren't allowed to take into account whether Mbemba would have got back to cover. They can only decide if he was already covering at the time of the foul. If they decided it wasn't a goalscoring opportunity I think that means they had to decide that Fletcher wasn't getting the ball if it's in the penalty area like that. They really don't help themselves with not explaining things.

The amount of gray in it means they should be explaining the thought process behind their decision. Big Sam after the match nailed it. Stop giving red cards for 'last man' fouls inside the box. The penalty is punishment enough.
 
Most of us seem to believe it was a penalty but not necessarily a red.

Most Mags seem to believe Coloccini was idiotic for barging into Fletcher.

If Elliot was going to collect then Coloccini was indeed stupid, if not then it's a penalty.

Either way no one knows what would've happened if he'd stayed on.

Not much to argue with there Smug. Even those of us who think it wasn't a penalty think Colo shouldn't have given the ref the choice by doing what he did. There were other options open to him which would have been far better.

As for what would have happened in the second half - like you say, none of us know which is why we get to debate on here. It's near impossible to take off our black and white or red and white specs when thinking about it - which is just the way it should be.
 
Not much to argue with there Smug. Even those of us who think it wasn't a penalty think Colo shouldn't have given the ref the choice by doing what he did. There were other options open to him which would have been far better.

As for what would have happened in the second half - like you say, none of us know which is why we get to debate on here. It's near impossible to take off our black and white or red and white specs when thinking about it - which is just the way it should be.

<ok>

My take is that Allardyce has had a fortnight with the bottom team who's confidence was shot to pieces.

He couldn't risk attacking and leaving our defence being exposed to your pace.

Once again Newcastle conceded from being in our box seconds before ....... just like the AJ goal at SJP.

The move for the first was worth a goal and we'll never know if Fletcher would've scored.

I'd guarantee Coloccini wouldn't have barged into Fletcher if he'd thought there was no chance of him scoring.
 
<ok>

My take is that Allardyce has had a fortnight with the bottom team who's confidence was shot to pieces.

He couldn't risk attacking and leaving our defence being exposed to your pace.

Once again Newcastle conceded from being in our box seconds before ....... just like the AJ goal at SJP.

The move for the first was worth a goal and we'll never know if Fletcher would've scored.

I'd guarantee Coloccini wouldn't have barged into Fletcher if he'd thought there was no chance of him scoring.

I think it was grandpops touched on it earlier (but might have been someone else). Part of it could have been down to him not having faith in Elliot to come and collect the ball. If that's the case it was a big error of judgement. He might be 3rd choice keeper but he is still an international goalie (somehow). No matter who is on the pitch you have to trust them to do their job (unless it's a kid in goal like we had last season at one point). I was far more worried about Lascelles being thrown into a derby than having Elliot in goal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grandpops
Most of us seem to believe it was a penalty but not necessarily a red.

Most Mags seem to believe Coloccini was idiotic for barging into Fletcher.

If Elliot was going to collect then Coloccini was indeed stupid, if not then it's a penalty.

Either way no one knows what would've happened if he'd stayed on.

Don`t agree smug. Elliot was 3rd choice keeper remember. I don`t think Colo was confident the keeper was going to collect so took Fletcher out.

That`s the way it looked to me. Not stupid just not sure so made sure.

I think that`s what I mean. possibly. ish. help. o_O
 
I think it was grandpops touched on it earlier (but might have been someone else). Part of it could have been down to him not having faith in Elliot to come and collect the ball. If that's the case it was a big error of judgement. He might be 3rd choice keeper but he is still an international goalie (somehow). No matter who is on the pitch you have to trust them to do their job (unless it's a kid in goal like we had last season at one point). I was far more worried about Lascelles being thrown into a derby than having Elliot in goal.

It was me mate. I wasn`t suggesting his lack of ability, more the fact that he was a comparative newbie as it were & Colo wasn`t taking any chances. That`s basically what I was suggesting.

edit: see also [HASHTAG]#406[/HASHTAG]. I repeat, help. Getting a bit lost.
 
It was me mate. I wasn`t suggesting his lack of ability, more the fact that he was a comparative newbie as it were & Colo wasn`t taking any chances. That`s basically what I was suggesting.

Yeah i got that and I think that could have played a big part in what happened. It was Colo who I was saying was wrong to think it. There's plenty on our board who question his ability though. I'm not one of them. I think he is an ok option for a third choice keeper and his distribution is miles better than Krul's. He doesn't pull off many worldies but he does the basics ok - almost the complete opposite of Pants in that game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grandpops
Yeah i got that and I think that could have played a big part in what happened. It was Colo who I was saying was wrong to think it. There's plenty on our board who question his ability though. I'm not one of them. I think he is an ok option for a third choice keeper and his distribution is miles better than Krul's. He doesn't pull off many worldies but he does the basics ok - almost the complete opposite of Pants in that game.
You know what mate? I like you a lot. Perfectly level headed, reasoned debater.
****ing canny lad you. <ok>
 
Aye, Albert will have you disemboweled with a porcupine if he finds out you've been fraternizing with me. <laugh>

Albert's a good lad. Popular as a fart in an astronaut's suit on here but that's the way forum's go. I honestly think a lot of the people who argue the most on here would probably get on in real life. By the same token there's probably people from our own sides that would quickly rub us up the wrong way if we had to spend time with them in real life. Makes life more interesting though <laugh>
 
Yeah i got that and I think that could have played a big part in what happened. It was Colo who I was saying was wrong to think it. There's plenty on our board who question his ability though. I'm not one of them. I think he is an ok option for a third choice keeper and his distribution is miles better than Krul's. He doesn't pull off many worldies but he does the basics ok - almost the complete opposite of Pants in that game.

I think that`s very close to what I was thinking. It was Colo who had the doubts and took the option of taking the striker out. That`s the way he saw it, that`s what he did. So be it.

Anyway, it`s done now. Nothing any of us can do about it.
 
Albert's a good lad. Popular as a fart in an astronaut's suit on here but that's the way forum's go. I honestly think a lot of the people who argue the most on here would probably get on in real life. By the same token there's probably people from our own sides that would quickly rub us up the wrong way if we had to spend time with them in real life. Makes life more interesting though <laugh>
Mmm, questionable.
Anyway, pass my love on to Brenda & Debbie mate & keep popping on. <ok>
 
Not much to argue with there Smug. Even those of us who think it wasn't a penalty think Colo shouldn't have given the ref the choice by doing what he did. There were other options open to him which would have been far better.

As for what would have happened in the second half - like you say, none of us know which is why we get to debate on here. It's near impossible to take off our black and white or red and white specs when thinking about it - which is just the way it should be.
That's the camp I'm in mate. We keep shooting ourselves in the foot - when we stop doing that, we can start looking at other factors like refs, luck etc. Until then though only ourselves to blame.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QWOP
Albert's a good lad. Popular as a fart in an astronaut's suit on here but that's the way forum's go. I honestly think a lot of the people who argue the most on here would probably get on in real life. By the same token there's probably people from our own sides that would quickly rub us up the wrong way if we had to spend time with them in real life. Makes life more interesting though <laugh>

I`m going out on a limb here cos I reckon he does a lot to keep that forum going.

Just had a look at some of the others. Bournemouth last post 1st Oct. West Brom last post 2nd Oct. West Ham last post 4 Oct. Man City last post Sep 29. They`re ****ing dead.

Credit to the lad for putting some effort in. <applause>

OK Billy fire away. :bandit:

Albert, if you `like` this post I`ll never buy your chips again.