He is correct. Although wages are unrestricted there is still a limit on the losses against the P&L accounts
I clearly don't have the time to trawl around and look at people's ages. But it's nice to know people can have an opinion on what they see.
So funny people had pictures of Mr Allam saying Allam out on Tuesday at Accrington now people are complaining the good Dr won't spend his money so typical of supporters
You really are a silly lad, I used the search function using Jake - 30 seconds spent, the rest took way less than 10 minutes - if your computer skills are so poor then I am surprised. I know you wouldn't have bothered, I did say you didn't, which is why you failed to see you 'liked' the very point you claim is rubbish - yours was one of those views on the forum . It is particularly damning to your so-called 'knowledge' credibility (that you use to criticise me) that you fail to see that the stats, when used in isolation can be questioned or applied in different ways, which is why anyone who needs to use them will be sure to use them with the benefit of watching the player or taking the advice of someone who has (Scout - do you know the principle?). The views on Hudds had being gathering support for some time, that game was simply a milestone - but, again, you do not have the nous to understand that. Your last sentence simply makes you look daft, which is disappointing as I thought better of you, but I understand your style now; you are incapable of admitting you are wrong and will argue against yourself, which, on here, is new achievement! Take a bow.
"if owner does not inject equity" Of course he just injects loans, which he did as most do to speculate and get into the big money so he could pocket some of that in the top tier. If he's out of that race now, then it could take him some time to get much of his money back and disappear. I doubt many want to buy clubs outside of the Sky League. He's also barely bothered investing long term in the club, only recently bothering to upgrade training facilties.
****ing hell you're like a dog with a really **** bone. Take a bow for what? Beating you? It's not ****ing difficult. Your post is bollocks and it doesn't actually demonstrate anything, other than the fact you don't like being beaten with simple facts. So what if I liked a post? I've liked hundreds of posts? Livermore for that one day may have had a good game. http://www.squawka.com/comparison-m..._passes/pass_completion/key_passes/assists#90 Here are the facts, based solely on players performances, put together by Squawka a football stats specialist used by many professionals within football. Fez however would rather use a few 'Likes' and comments from a few forum members on one match performance, with which to base his argument, oh and his personal expert opinion. Brilliant, no really. I think that settles any further pointless debate.
He didn't like the fact that I said Huddlestone had carried Livermore last season. He doesn't like the fact that the head to head stats Huddlestone v Livermore for last season support my argument. I think that just about covers it.
How dare you reply in such an impertinent fashion. I have been away and my hands have been full. I return home and find out some gems reference transfer news and you choose to ridicule me.
I am sure he'll be sat furiously typing away as we speak. He loves the last word, even when he's wrong.
Though there's no wage limit, wages still do play a part in meeting FFP, as they're still part of the clubs spending and could potentially contribute to losses. That won't effect us though, as we're not going to make any losses.
