ctwd now out in the open

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
What will booing achieve ?

NOTHING .

IF YOU SUPPORT THE NAME CHANGE AND THE ALLAMS STAYING YOU NEED TO LET THE FA KNOW YOUR BEHIND HIM.

Only the fa can keep Assem Allam here by changing the name because he has vowed to walk away from ALL fans if he doesn't get his way.
 
originallambrettaman said:
Who the hell accused AA of being a rapist or a *****phile?
Click to expand...

X made a pretty distasteful analogy which made reference to AA saving your kids from drowning them and then raping them.

If someone posted that sort of stuff but put my name instead of AA I dare say I'd take it that they were implying I was not on normal courtyard exercise.
 
He then started to say he 'd send me a white feather in the post for challenging it?

Grade A bell end that he is.
 
Vaslav said:
The club's name is irrelevant if there is no club. I DO blame CTWD for this state of affairs. They shouldn't start what they can't control. Their chairman, if he really isn't anti-Allam shouldn't post tweets convincing sane neutrals he IS anti-Allam, nor should CTWD ramp up tensions by having the gall to issue a statement suggesting fans should not boo but that CTWD have no right to tell those, including CTDW members and supporters "protesting" at 1904 not to provoke booing. CTWD's media relations make Dr. Allam look like a smooth operator. The "silent majority" won't let this drop. There is a lot of gratitude towards Dr. Allam and a lot of fans, who will never post on a City fans' BB think he's been treated unfairly and they're slowly coming round to the view "who do CTWD think they are? They don't speak for me"
Click to expand...

Thick ****.
 
Vaslav said:
The club's name is irrelevant if there is no club. I DO blame CTWD for this state of affairs. They shouldn't start what they can't control. Their chairman, if he really isn't anti-Allam shouldn't post tweets convincing sane neutrals he IS anti-Allam, nor should CTWD ramp up tensions by having the gall to issue a statement suggesting fans should not boo but that CTWD have no right to tell those, including CTDW members and supporters "protesting" at 1904 not to provoke booing. CTWD's media relations make Dr. Allam look like a smooth operator. The "silent majority" won't let this drop. There is a lot of gratitude towards Dr. Allam and a lot of fans, who will never post on a City fans' BB think he's been treated unfairly and they're slowly coming round to the view "who do CTWD think they are? They don't speak for me"
Click to expand...
You really are missing the important point here, and obssessing towards CTWD. It suggests you're trying to deflect from the real matters at hand.

The issue is the name change, Allam's refusal to accept the ruling of the FA, and CTWD's response to it. The hip flask means **** all. He's the chairman of a football fans' group, not the ****ing Prime Minister.
 
StrovolosTiger said:
That's a complete kop-out. CTWD had a great success influencing those fans you now claim you are incapable of affecting.

The booing will not go away and the atmosphere will become more and more poisonous. It's a shame you and the rest of CTWD care more about keeping the name of the club in your little battle than you do about preventing the war that will now ensue.

Still as long as you can blame a 75 year old I suppose you'll be able to avoid responsibility for just about anything.
Click to expand...


Well he started it. And he could have finished it in April, but no no he waits till the season is underway and kicks it all off again. Why didn't start his appeal in April ?
 
originallambrettaman said:
We issued a statement asking for fan unity, as Hull City fans should never be booing other Hull City fans.

Whether people act on that request, or completely ignore it, is entirely up to them.

Either way, there's only one person responsible for the current fan issues and that's a sulky old man who doesn't know when to shut up.
Click to expand...

Lambrettaman, You don't get it. The CTWD statement has made a bad situation worse. Rather than ask CTWD members and supporters to stop what is perceived to be protests against The Allams at 1904 which provoke booing from other fans, CTWD think a. It's the fault of other fans for responding to protesters' provocation b. CTWD have no right to ask their members and supporters to stop the protesting CTWD started but c. CTWD DO have a right to ask other fans in the KC, people who have nothing to do with CTWD to control themselves and not react to the provocation CTWD refuse to try and put an end to. If you think the booing was bad on Monday night, I reckon there are people polishing their booing technique for the Man City match now. If CTWD don't like the way the previously silent majority choose to respond to the CTWD protests chants CTWD refuse to try and stop, tough. CTWD have never spoken for me and if Mark Gretton is the best candidate in CTWD for chairman, blessed with the most unerringly correct judgement ... CTWD deserve all the ridicule they're getting.
 
Carmine Galante. said:
X made a pretty distasteful analogy which made reference to AA saving your kids from drowning them and then raping them.

If someone posted that sort of stuff but put my name instead of AA I dare say I'd take it that they were implying I was not on normal courtyard exercise.
Click to expand...
What's that got to do with my post though? Chazz directed it at me and I still don't understand what point he was tring to make.
 
Vaslav said:
Lambrettaman, You don't get it. The CTWD statement has made a bad situation worse. Rather than ask CTWD members and supporters to stop what is perceived to be protests against The Allams at 1904 which provoke booing from other fans, CTWD think a. It's the fault of other fans for responding to protesters' provocation b. CTWD have no right to ask their members and supporters to stop the protesting CTWD started but c. CTWD DO have a right to ask other fans in the KC, people who have nothing to do with CTWD to control themselves and no react to the provocation CTWD refuse to try and put an end to. If you think the booing was bad on Monday night, I reckon there are people polishing their booing technique for the Man City match now. If CTWD don't like the way the previously silent majority choose to respond to the CTWD protests chants CTWD refuse to try and stop, tough. CTWD have never spoken for me if Mark Gretton is the best candidate in CTWD for chairman, blessed with the most unerringly correct judgement ... CTWD deserve all the ridicule they're getting.
Click to expand...
You really are unbelievable.

You're focussing on the hip flask in the room, when there's an elephant just behind you.

What a ****ing moron.
 
Vaslav said:
Lambrettaman, You don't get it. The CTWD statement has made a bad situation worse. Rather than ask CTWD members and supporters to stop what is perceived to be protests against The Allams at 1904 which provoke booing from other fans, CTWD think a. It's the fault of other fans for responding to protesters' provocation b. CTWD have no right to ask their members and supporters to stop the protesting CTWD started but c. CTWD DO have a right to ask other fans in the KC, people who have nothing to do with CTWD to control themselves and no react to the provocation CTWD refuse to try and put an end to. If you think the booing was bad on Monday night, I reckon there are people polishing their booing technique for the Man City match now. If CTWD don't like the way the previously silent majority choose to respond to the CTWD protests chants CTWD refuse to try and stop, tough. CTWD have never spoken for me if Mark Gretton is the best candidate in CTWD for chairman, blessed with the most unerringly correct judgement ... CTWD deserve all the ridicule they're getting.
Click to expand...

Thick ****
 
Vaslav said:
Lambrettaman, You don't get it. The CTWD statement has made a bad situation worse. Rather than ask CTWD members and supporters to stop what is perceived to be protests against The Allams at 1904 which provoke booing from other fans, CTWD think a. It's the fault of other fans for responding to protesters' provocation b. CTWD have no right to ask their members and supporters to stop the protesting CTWD started but c. CTWD DO have a right to ask other fans in the KC, people who have nothing to do with CTWD to control themselves and not react to the provocation CTWD refuse to try and put an end to. If you think the booing was bad on Monday night, I reckon there are people polishing their booing technique for the Man City match now. If CTWD don't like the way the previously silent majority choose to respond to the CTWD protests chants CTWD refuse to try and stop, tough. CTWD have never spoken for me if Mark Gretton is the best candidate in CTWD for chairman, blessed with the most unerringly correct judgement ... CTWD deserve all the ridicule they're getting.
Click to expand...

Oh lord. This just gets funnier and funnier.

You have the IQ of a tablecloth.
 
Vaslav said:
Lambrettaman, You don't get it. The CTWD statement has made a bad situation worse. Rather than ask CTWD members and supporters to stop what is perceived to be protests against The Allams at 1904 which provoke booing from other fans, CTWD think a. It's the fault of other fans for responding to protesters' provocation b. CTWD have no right to ask their members and supporters to stop the protesting CTWD started but c. CTWD DO have a right to ask other fans in the KC, people who have nothing to do with CTWD to control themselves and not react to the provocation CTWD refuse to try and put an end to. If you think the booing was bad on Monday night, I reckon there are people polishing their booing technique for the Man City match now. If CTWD don't like the way the previously silent majority choose to respond to the CTWD protests chants CTWD refuse to try and stop, tough. CTWD have never spoken for me and if Mark Gretton is the best candidate in CTWD for chairman, blessed with the most unerringly correct judgement ... CTWD deserve all the ridicule they're getting.
Click to expand...

CTWD wouldn't even exist if it wasn't for the name change application.

That campaign finished over five months ago.

The whole thing is over, all we're left with now is the occasional mad rant from our owner.

Even that should be stopped by the FA shortly and we can go back to just supporting our team.
 
originallambrettaman;7101360]CTWD wouldn't even exist if it wasn't for the name change application.

That campaign finished over five months ago.

The whole thing is over, all we're left with now is the occasional mad rant from our owner.

Even that should be stopped by the FA shortly and we can go back to just supporting our team.

If it's over why do persist in singing CTWD at 19.04 which is associated with the protest, if you want fans to stop booing just sing something else it's not rocket science
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back