ctwd now out in the open

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
mark KC said:
If they're entitled to their own opinion, stop releasing press statements telling them what their opinion should be.
Click to expand...

We didn't, we simply issued a statement suggesting that Hull City fans should not be booing each other, do you disagree with that statement?

For the record, I believe that City Till I Die will be sung at 19.04, I believe some people will boo and I believe that some of those who boo will get a twatted for doing so.

It's a shocking situation, Hull City fans are the most divided they've ever been and for what?

So some stubborn twat can **** about for another few months before it's finally killed off by the FA?

It's pathetic and those who attempt to defend it should be ashamed of themselves.
 
originallambrettaman said:
We didn't, we simply issued a statement suggesting that Hull City fans should not be booing each other, do you disagree with that statement?

For the record, I believe that City Till I Die will be sung at 19.04, I believe some people will boo and I believe that some of those who boo will get a t**tted for doing so.

It's a shocking situation, Hull City fans are the most divided they've ever been and for what?

So some stubborn t**t can f** about for another few months before it's finally killed off by the FA?

It's pathetic and those who attempt to defend it should be ashamed of themselves.
Click to expand...

But apart from that you're fully supportive of the "stubborn pathetic t**t" are you?
 
Chazz Rheinhold said:
A bit daft?? <doh> Come on Polly.
Click to expand...
What were you hoping I would say? That he should be hanged? He should be sacked as Chair of an organisation that you don't rate anyway?

I honestly couldn't give a **** what he has inscribed on his hip flask, and I honestly couldn't give a **** about whether or not this makes him a fit and proper person to lead CTWD or even wipe his own arse. I'm a member of CTWD but I have little or no interest in its internal machinations. I'm ****ing glad they were formed, cos without them we might not have mobilised national opinion so strongly against the name change idea.

As I said, yet again; you're obssessed with CTWD, and this is leading you to ignore the obvious issues at hand here.
 
Polly13 said:
What were you hoping I would say? That he should be hanged? He should be sacked as Chair of an organisation that you don't rate anyway?

I honestly couldn't give a **** what he has inscribed on his hip flask, and I honestly couldn't give a **** about whether or not this makes him a fit and proper person to lead CTWD or even wipe his own arse. I'm a member of CTWD but I have little or no interest in its internal machinations. I'm ****ing glad they were formed, cos without them we might not have mobilised national opinion so strongly against the name change idea.
Click to expand...

What if he was a rapist or a *****phile Polly? What if he raped your mrs? You ok with it then?




























PS its only some of the ****e Allam got on here.
 
Chazz Rheinhold said:
What if he was a rapist or a *****phile Polly? What if he raped your mrs? You ok with it then?

PS its only some of the ****e Allam got on here.
Click to expand...
I'm missing something here. I would answer if I thought there was a sane point to the question. Excuse my ignorance Chazz, but you might have to have another go at that one, cos I don't know what you're driving at.
 
mark KC said:
But apart from that you're fully supportive of the "stubborn pathetic t**t" are you?
Click to expand...

You won't realise, as it's before your time, but we've had other owners pre Allam and we'll have other owners post Allam.

Some owners I may totally support, others, I'll support to differing degrees.

That's how it generally works.
 
originallambrettaman said:
We issued a statement asking for fan unity, as Hull City fans should never be booing other Hull City fans.

Whether people act on that request, or completely ignore it, is entirely up to them.

Either way, there's only one person responsible for the current fan issues and that's a sulky old man who doesn't know when to shut up.
Click to expand...


That's a complete kop-out. CTWD had a great success influencing those fans you now claim you are incapable of affecting.

The booing will not go away and the atmosphere will become more and more poisonous. It's a shame you and the rest of CTWD care more about keeping the name of the club in your little battle than you do about preventing the war that will now ensue.

Still as long as you can blame a 75 year old I suppose you'll be able to avoid responsibility for just about anything.
 
StrovolosTiger said:
That's a complete kop-out. CTWD had a great success influencing those fans you now claim you are incapable of affecting.

The booing will not go away and the atmosphere will become more and more poisonous. It's a shame you and the rest of CTWD care more about keeping the name of the club in your little battle than you do about preventing the war that will now ensue.

Still as long as you can blame a 75 year old I suppose you'll be able to avoid responsibility for just about anything.
Click to expand...
So you don't think Mr Allam is to blame for this mess?

Just unbelievable. Your posts are becoming more embarrassing every time you make one.

The fact that you regard saving the club's name as a "little battle" says so much about you.
 
StrovolosTiger said:
That's a complete kop-out. CTWD had a great success influencing those fans you now claim you are incapable of affecting.

The booing will not go away and the atmosphere will become more and more poisonous. It's a shame you and the rest of CTWD care more about keeping the name of the club in your little battle than you do about preventing the war that will now ensue.

Still as long as you can blame a 75 year old I suppose you'll be able to avoid responsibility for just about anything.
Click to expand...

As long as you get to see Stevie G, all will be fine, eh Strov?
 
Strov' and Chazz doing a great job here. Just reinforces exactly what we are up against, really.
 
StrovolosTiger said:
That's a complete kop-out. CTWD had a great success influencing those fans you now claim you are incapable of affecting.

The booing will not go away and the atmosphere will become more and more poisonous. It's a shame you and the rest of CTWD care more about keeping the name of the club in your little battle than you do about preventing the war that will now ensue.

Still as long as you can blame a 75 year old I suppose you'll be able to avoid responsibility for just about anything.
Click to expand...

Are you seriously trying to lay the blame for this with CTWD?
 
The club's name is irrelevant if there is no club. I DO blame CTWD for this state of affairs. They shouldn't start what they can't control. Their chairman, if he really isn't anti-Allam shouldn't post tweets convincing sane neutrals he IS anti-Allam, nor should CTWD ramp up tensions by having the gall to issue a statement suggesting fans should not boo but that CTWD have no right to tell those, including CTDW members and supporters "protesting" at 1904 not to provoke booing. CTWD's media relations make Dr. Allam look like a smooth operator. The "silent majority" won't let this drop. There is a lot of gratitude towards Dr. Allam and a lot of fans, who will never post on a City fans' BB think he's been treated unfairly and they're slowly coming round to the view "who do CTWD think they are? They don't speak for me"
 
and the needle returns to the start of the track...

He can't have the name, the FA say NO.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back