This debate/argument has gone completely and utterly beyond be now!
Right speaking to the voice of reason
Charles do you accept that 10 years ago when you finished 13th in Divison 4 you was nothing but an average divison 4 side?
This debate/argument has gone completely and utterly beyond be now!
This debate/argument has gone completely and utterly beyond be now!
Right speaking to the voice of reason
Charles do you accept that 10 years ago when you finished 13th in Divison 4 you was nothing but an average divison 4 side?
So because YOU picked a low season, that's where we've always been?
You're either an idiot or you're on a wind up.
We're a few places above our lifetime average and with less assets than we've had in the past as we don't own the ground and have a higher debt than we've ever had, albeit manageable and owed to someone that in reality can't claim it.
I guess you see that as argumentative, what with it showing why you're wrong.
So because YOU picked a low season, that's where we've always been?
You're either an idiot or you're on a wind up.
We're a few places above our lifetime average and with less assets than we've had in the past as we don't own the ground and have a higher debt than we've ever had, albeit manageable and owed to someone that in reality can't claim it.
I guess you see that as argumentative, what with it showing why you're wrong.
Further proof your just looking for an argument.
Well yeah obviously, but now we are 3rd in the Championship, 3 seasons after playing 2 seasons in the Prem, it shows that we are a club on the up!
Right speaking to the voice of reason
Charles do you accept that 10 years ago when you finished 13th in Divison 4 you was nothing but an average divison 4 side?


That would be bollocks, would it not?Well yeah obviously, but now we are 3rd in the Championship, 3 seasons after playing 2 seasons in the Prem, it shows that we are a club on the up!
Yeah I agree with you. Its DMD who arguing against it
Further proof your just looking for an argument.


Thought you were leaving Charlie boy. Didn't last long lmao
Only if you define argument as sense.
Leicester, a Division three side by Proud's logic.![]()
I suppose it's what you mean by grown.
Our attendances now are on par with what they were 10 years ago, yet are far less than what they were 50 years ago.
The level of football is higher now than what it was 10 years ago, but not as high as it was 4 years ago, 20 years ago, 30, 40 or 50 years ago. We have spent the majority of our existence at our current level.
If you want to gauge whether we have grown as a club it needs to be looked at over a longer period in order to get a realistic picture of where we currently are compared to our past.
Would extending the KP to 45K be worth the expenditure taking into account your inability to currently fill the Walkers? Do you have 25K apathetic supporters?

The recent 'massive' rise also includes a few minutes away from liquidation and one of if not the largest debts in our history with no concrete assets.![]()
Right speaking to the voice of reason
Charles do you accept that 10 years ago when you finished 13th in Divison 4 you was nothing but an average divison 4 side?
Yeah that year we was a divison 3 side
I think you are really struggling to grasp the difference between being a divison 4 side and a divison 4 club.
I gave you more credit then that but hey ho

That's a really good question. Firstly though, I wouldn't claim we have a big fanbase, I'd argue we have the potential to develop one though.
It was a massive bone of contention at the time. The owners wanted 35,000 but Sport England, who were supposed to fund an element of it, said it should be 15,000. Ironically it was Trevor Brooking at the forefront of that, and the last time he played here was in front of something like three times that number.
We also suffer from small minded local politicians that favour the local rugby, who don't need a big stadium.
So between them, we were allowed 25,000 with a built in design to increase it over 30,000 if/when needed at the risk of all Sport England money being pulled from this area if we disagreed.
Unfortunately, when we needed the expansion, nobody had the money. Our current chairman has proposed some schemes, but there's been a major falling out between him and our local council, to the extent thy won't speak and the chairman's threatening to build his own stadium for us.
The problems are made worse as the club has no control over the stewards and concessions, so the match day experience can't be improved without a lot of negotiations.
Ok then you win. Your a little tin pot club
Happy now?
You're asking the question 'do you accept, then when you were doing ****e, you were a bit ****e?'.
How about the question, 'in which tier of English football have you spent most of your existence?'.
Thanks for the info, quite interest.
How will your owners be allowed to build a new stadium if they won't communicate with the local council. Are they going to build it outside their catchment area? If so, perhaps all this new stadium talk is a bluff to worry the local authority over loss of income.
I'm always happy, but it's not a question of being tinpot, it's just the simple fact you're showing your ignorance again.