I've put several reasons why your argument is flawed. The argument is simply you feeling you know more than us about Hull City.
Goodbye
- Thread starter Proud Tiger
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
I've put several reasons why your argument is flawed. The argument is simply you feeling you know more than us about Hull City.
Oh yeah, I've just noticed you signature!
Have you not left yet!!
Or was that just another one of your lies.
Seriously this proves DMD will always come on here to argue. I have paid Hull City a compliment and he has basically argued saying they are a small club
And for some reason what I said is only wrong because im "ignorant" of something
So from now on its pretty pointless talking with him as he is just going to disagree with whatever is said.
And for some reason what I said is only wrong because im "ignorant" of something
So from now on its pretty pointless talking with him as he is just going to disagree with whatever is said.
It's like watching a small child that doesn't want to hear it's bedtime so puts its fingers in its ears and goes la la la.
Seriously this proves DMD will always come on here to argue. I have paid Hull City a compliment and he has basically argued saying they are a small club
And for some reason what I said is only wrong because im "ignorant" of something
So from now on its pretty pointless talking with him as he is just going to disagree with whatever is said.
Why does the truth bother you?
I've pointed out where your argument is bollocks. I've even put examples you could relate to and you agree it's bollocks.
I'm still unsure if you're thick or on a wind up.
See above to realise why your claim isn't accurate.
A division two side at a low point is hardly the same thing now is it.
What year were Leicester in the third tier? Let's pick that year as the start and claim that's all Leicester were.That would be bollocks, would it not?
You are only as good as your current league position. 10-15 years ago you were an average four tier side. You were there because you deserved to be, not by accident. Don't really know why you're arguing against this other than to be argumentative.
Hull City average existence is in the 2nd tier of football.
Proud....u was only picking our lowest point 10 years ago.
Currently, this is our best season ever at League two level. When we got promoted in 2008 we sneaked in thro the back door and finished 3rd. This time we are already 3rd.
Can all posters please answer 1 question for me..........It appears after only day on here that posters are trying to get one over one another instead of having reasonable debate. It all seems like rather childlike (I will expect the ****off to your own board then if u dont like it).
Incidently, apart from posting on Hulls board, I have visited your board mainly cause the other teams in the championship do not have any fans on not606.
Proud....u was only picking our lowest point 10 years ago.
Currently, this is our best season ever at League two level. When we got promoted in 2008 we sneaked in thro the back door and finished 3rd. This time we are already 3rd.
Can all posters please answer 1 question for me..........It appears after only day on here that posters are trying to get one over one another instead of having reasonable debate. It all seems like rather childlike (I will expect the ****off to your own board then if u dont like it).
Incidently, apart from posting on Hulls board, I have visited your board mainly cause the other teams in the championship do not have any fans on not606.
So Leicester are a Division three side. Yes?
Try and apply logic to your arguments. Logic is SO important.
I picked 10 years off the top of my head. 10 years is the recent history. I wasnt saying Hull are a 4th divison club
At that time 10 years ago you was a 4th divison team which had just finished midtable. You have since grown as a club on and off the field. In these 10 years you have reached the highest divison for the first time in your history so arguably the last 10 years have been the most successful in your clubs history
Try and apply logic to your arguments. Logic is SO important.
That goes completely out the window with him. If you said the grass was green he would argue
But you're ignoring almost being liquidated and having a bigger debt and less assets than we've ever had and being at just about our lifetime average position.
It may look like that if you keep ignoring the uncomfortable truths that show the flaws in your position.
Try and apply logic to your arguments. Logic is SO important.
I totally agree. Now explain that to t'other nugget.
You being division three is part of the logic of the argument he's offering.
See above to realise why your claim isn't accurate.
A division two side at a low point is hardly the same thing now is it.
What year were Leicester in the third tier? Let's pick that year as the start and claim that's all Leicester were.
He said you were an average Divison Four side. Not that you've spent most of your history in Division Four. Sounds like paranoia on your behalf.
Back in 2008, we were a top Divisn Three side. But this one year, the only year we've dropped out of the top two tiers for the first time in our history. Besides, it's not like you dropped down into the fourth league and bounced straight back up as championship (like we did) is it? You were there for a good half decade.
But you're ignoring almost being liquidated and having a bigger debt and less assets than we've ever had and being at just about our lifetime average position.
What are you on about now?
3rd is nothing close to your lifetime average.