Goodbye

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
10 years ago you finished 13th in Divison 3 which is now League 2

Now your 3rd in the Championship. Having played in the top divison twice for the first time in your history and have moved into a new stadium. It hardly me claiming to know more about your club then the Hull fans

Its just you looking for a fight

Erm, yes it is exactly that. <doh>
 
You're missing your own point. You said: "Except, we're not angry or bitter and you not us were on about attendances." I pointed out that Hull started talking about attendances, not us. The number of Hull fans involved in the original conversation is irrelevant. <ok>


Well, now your original screach has been shown to be bollocks it is. :laugh:

You do try to wriggle. :laugh:
 
Think we now have a few contenders for the most boring twat to visit the Leicester forum. CB is still winning it hands down. but DMD and OLM are coming up on the rails. Charlie is stuck at the starting gate and facing the wrong way.
 
Who mentioned bans? Only you. I merely commented on your threatening nature when instructing me to stay away, that's why I stated "individual contributor" in my post.

I'm glad you take it with a pinch of salt as you really do a good job of hiding it when responding. I crossed the line many, many, many months ago. Can I presume you also agree Danger crossed the line many times over the last few weeks?

I find it hard to believe you don't read my posts as you tend to respond to them all. even the ones that don't concern you. Strange, but obviously I believe you.

Hugs & Kisses

xx

I never threatened you to stay away. Just offered some advice

Take it or dont take it. Its completely up to you. <smooch>
 
Who mentioned bans? Only you. I merely commented on your threatening nature when instructing me to stay away, that's why I stated "individual contributor" in my post.

I'm glad you take it with a pinch of salt as you really do a good job of hiding it when responding. I crossed the line many, many, many months ago. Can I presume you also agree Danger crossed the line many times over the last few weeks?

I find it hard to believe you don't read my posts as you tend to respond to them all. even the ones that don't concern you. Strange, but obviously I believe you.

Hugs & Kisses

xx

Threatening nature from Proud?

That's ****ing laughable from the one who tells people to go and finger their mother/gran/etc
 
Think we now have a few contenders for the most boring twat to visit the Leicester forum. CB is still winning it hands down. but DMD and OLM are coming up on the rails. Charlie is stuck at the starting gate and facing the wrong way.

<laugh>

I think we should adopt Charles as one of our own
 
You know what your not even worth arguing with. You would argue the sky is green and grass is blue if someone said the opposite


i'm guessing you didn't do as I suggested and look beyond the last ten years then. <ok>

As I put in an earlier reply, picking a starting point of on our lowest points is skewing your view.

Once you widen things, you'll see why it's you being argumentative due to your ignorance. I'm simply trying to broaden your limited knowledge, but you seem to think you know better.
 
Its not Charles. There is no ip address match so its more then likely a new member

thanks Proud. At least he checked it out before assuming the worst.

I am new to your board but why do you assume I am Charlie.

John Fallen....I am probably older than you. it is a user name that's all.

The last match i saw in Leicester was Hull City v. Fulham FA Cup replay on a Monday night. The cockneys won 1-0 and went on to Wembley to lose to WHU 2-0.
The same year I saw the 'Stones' play a small gig (3000 there) in Leicester. It cost me £3.

Anyhow, now Proud has identified me as a new member perhaps i might get a decent welcome to your Board.
 
OK, I retract the word "all". Do you accept then that it wasn't us that started going on about attendance?


Again, you miss the point. The attendance element is secondary, it's the "bit of frost" excuse that's the joke PLUS the attendance element's funny because of the lofty position some of you have taken over numbers in the past. As I've said, I couldn't care less about the numbers. Me and some mates go and have a laugh as we've always done.

So from that context, it's clearly leicester first to the calls. <ok>
 
thanks Proud. At least he checked it out before assuming the worst.

I am new to your board but why do you assume I am Charlie.

John Fallen....I am probably older than you. it is a user name that's all.

The last match i saw in Leicester was Hull City v. Fulham FA Cup replay on a Monday night. The cockneys won 1-0 and went on to Wembley to lose to WHU 2-0.
The same year I saw the 'Stones' play a small gig (3000 there) in Leicester. It cost me £3.

Anyhow, now Proud has identified me as a new member perhaps i might get a decent welcome to your Board.

Welcome anyway <ok>
 
It's you making a fuss about attendances, we're more laughing at you girls struggling in a bit of frost. :laugh:

By the way, if you really want to get into this pissing contest, you may want to check our history from a different stand point rather than one that suits, you'll find that we hold some historic attendance records. Starting ten years ago coincides with a serious dip in our history so is bound to look a tad dramatic. <doh>

I have a serious question about the KC. If you have such a big fan base, why was the KC only build to hold 25,586? We moved out of Filbert Street which held slightly less than that because we were capable of drawing 30,000+ crowds in the Premiership, and we're having to turn fans away (I was a victim of this myself when I a student and only went to games now and again). Is it because your owners couldn't see you drawing crowds in excess of 25k? Or did they not envisage you being in the top flight very often? It's odd, because most clubs that were having new grounds built around that time were getting 32,000 all-seater stadiums, but not Hull for some reason. Why do you think this was?
 
thanks Proud. At least he checked it out before assuming the worst.

I am new to your board but why do you assume I am Charlie.

John Fallen....I am probably older than you. it is a user name that's all.

The last match i saw in Leicester was Hull City v. Fulham FA Cup replay on a Monday night. The cockneys won 1-0 and went on to Wembley to lose to WHU 2-0.
The same year I saw the 'Stones' play a small gig (3000 there) in Leicester. It cost me £3.

Anyhow, now Proud has identified me as a new member perhaps i might get a decent welcome to your Board.

Over18... I wrote a whole reply to your original post, then read someone accusing you of being Charlie, assumed that to be a true and deleted it <laugh>

I apologise... Basically Charles has done something similar before, and a mysterious user called 'Major Fox' started a thread, who happened to have the same IP address as Charles... Hence we were sceptical as your first post on this board was on a thread about Charles leaving...

Anyways... Welcome <ok>
 
Again, you miss the point. The attendance element is secondary, it's the "bit of frost" excuse that's the joke PLUS the attendance element's funny because of the lofty position some of you have taken over numbers in the past. As I've said, I couldn't care less about the numbers. Me and some mates go and have a laugh as we've always done.

So from that context, it's clearly leicester first to the calls. <ok>

So... you're saying that the snow coincided with one of our lowest leagues attendances ever? Or are you saying that fans made excuses to not do a thing they love doing? Because either way, you sound ridiculous.

And I see you're trying to wriggle out of answering my question directly, so please do so. Trying to add historic context to it is just weak.