Right Charles as a Hull City fan do you accept that your club has grown massively on and off the field in the last 10 years?
You know what your not even worth arguing with. You would argue the sky is green and grass is blue if someone said the opposite
Think we now have a few contenders for the most boring twat to visit the Leicester forum. CB is still winning it hands down. but DMD and OLM are coming up on the rails. Charlie is stuck at the starting gate and facing the wrong way.
I never threatened you to stay away. Just offered some advice Take it or dont take it. Its completely up to you.
Threatening nature from Proud? That's ****ing laughable from the one who tells people to go and finger their mother/gran/etc
i'm guessing you didn't do as I suggested and look beyond the last ten years then. As I put in an earlier reply, picking a starting point of on our lowest points is skewing your view. Once you widen things, you'll see why it's you being argumentative due to your ignorance. I'm simply trying to broaden your limited knowledge, but you seem to think you know better.
OK, I retract the word "all". Do you accept then that it wasn't us that started going on about attendance?
thanks Proud. At least he checked it out before assuming the worst. I am new to your board but why do you assume I am Charlie. John Fallen....I am probably older than you. it is a user name that's all. The last match i saw in Leicester was Hull City v. Fulham FA Cup replay on a Monday night. The cockneys won 1-0 and went on to Wembley to lose to WHU 2-0. The same year I saw the 'Stones' play a small gig (3000 there) in Leicester. It cost me £3. Anyhow, now Proud has identified me as a new member perhaps i might get a decent welcome to your Board.
Again, you miss the point. The attendance element is secondary, it's the "bit of frost" excuse that's the joke PLUS the attendance element's funny because of the lofty position some of you have taken over numbers in the past. As I've said, I couldn't care less about the numbers. Me and some mates go and have a laugh as we've always done. So from that context, it's clearly leicester first to the calls.
I have a serious question about the KC. If you have such a big fan base, why was the KC only build to hold 25,586? We moved out of Filbert Street which held slightly less than that because we were capable of drawing 30,000+ crowds in the Premiership, and we're having to turn fans away (I was a victim of this myself when I a student and only went to games now and again). Is it because your owners couldn't see you drawing crowds in excess of 25k? Or did they not envisage you being in the top flight very often? It's odd, because most clubs that were having new grounds built around that time were getting 32,000 all-seater stadiums, but not Hull for some reason. Why do you think this was?
Over18... I wrote a whole reply to your original post, then read someone accusing you of being Charlie, assumed that to be a true and deleted it I apologise... Basically Charles has done something similar before, and a mysterious user called 'Major Fox' started a thread, who happened to have the same IP address as Charles... Hence we were sceptical as your first post on this board was on a thread about Charles leaving... Anyways... Welcome
So... you're saying that the snow coincided with one of our lowest leagues attendances ever? Or are you saying that fans made excuses to not do a thing they love doing? Because either way, you sound ridiculous. And I see you're trying to wriggle out of answering my question directly, so please do so. Trying to add historic context to it is just weak.