We haven’t let him go, he’s being replaced and we’re not going to play him anyway.
Getting wound up about things that haven’t happened is a weird pastime.
Transfer Rumours Winter 2025 Transfer Thread
- Thread starter originallambrettaman
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
We haven’t let him go, he’s being replaced and we’re not going to play him anyway.
Getting wound up about things that haven’t happened is a weird pastime.
We brought in Gelhardt though who played wide left when he came on against Millwall, so we've already got a wide player in.
He can go, Lincoln is done and Thomas or Barry will be coming in as well.
Selles has already said Gelhardt can play across all 3 attacking positions, Lincoln can play there, Vaughan at a push can play there. Longman isn't going to play so can go.
I’m not convinced that Geldhart or lincoln will offer more than Longman on the LW anyway. Hopefully one of them is quality.
Geldhart is here to play wide. Amrabat is here to play wide, Selles sees Joseph as able to play wide and Lincoln is coming in also.
How many replacements do.you want?
Not to mention that there's Burstow who's been keeping Longman out anyway, and Kamara can play left as well.
It's hardly as if we can't put a side out.
Longman really isn’t good enough. Ok he tries hard and has moments of brilliance but we need to move on.
It'll be haggling over who's responsible for the compo for the loan to Nantes ending early.
Just pay it (not meaning you personally).
Now is not the time to be f'king about.
Agree, he is one we’re absolutely crying out for. Pay the fee and get him in ASAP.
I don't think that actually is the reason, Amin's just being Amin. Always surprised people take him so literally.
Nantes will be lining up a replacement and refusing to budge until that's all ratified as they're under no obligation to.
Nantes will be lining up a replacement and refusing to budge until that's all ratified as they're under no obligation to.
The article makes no sense.
We know who are targets are and whether they'd be perms of loans. So we know what we'd have to play with. We know we need cover at CB, even once Hughes returns so we'd either be set on keeping Burns for the season or we'd be looking at signing him/someone else as that cover for the rest of the season.
Or is that just far too sensible for a City transfer policy?
Clearly there's some big brain stuff going on that a simple mind like yours or mine can't understand. Transfers are very complex after all.
Sounds like we won't be keeping Burns on loan. I wonder if we're even considering buying him outright.
Bloke sat in front of Acun must have thought FC was playing.
You must log in or register to see media
Maybe im nitpicking a bit
But our signings so far
Crooks hasnt played for 2+ months
Gelhardt hadnt played for months
Lincoln hasnt played for a month and a half
Amrabat hasnt played for 2+ months
Crooks and lincoln are essentially in their pre season
We badly need thomas and joseph
In our side
Just some fully match fit regular game time players asap
But our signings so far
Crooks hasnt played for 2+ months
Gelhardt hadnt played for months
Lincoln hasnt played for a month and a half
Amrabat hasnt played for 2+ months
Crooks and lincoln are essentially in their pre season
We badly need thomas and joseph
In our side
Just some fully match fit regular game time players asap