I've no idea if Walter is the right man for the job. Nobody possibly could after 13 games.
If you don't give him a fair crack with a whole new squad and a new style of playing then what's the ****ing point anymore.
Jan molby was sacked after less.
I've no idea if Walter is the right man for the job. Nobody possibly could after 13 games.
If you don't give him a fair crack with a whole new squad and a new style of playing then what's the ****ing point anymore.
YepI’m pretty confident Walter won’t be sacked even if we fail to beat Oxford.
We’re on course to get around 53 points if we carry on our current trajectory which is not amazing but solid mid table.
Jan molby was sacked after less.
What's your point?
Do we know if he would have done a good job if given the time?
I’m pretty confident Walter won’t be sacked even if we fail to beat Oxford.
We’re on course to get around 53 points if we carry on our current trajectory which is not amazing but solid mid table.
Jan molby was sacked after less.
My point is you can, in fact, make an assessment of a manager at this stage of the season. Shota was long gone by this stage two seasons ago.
Not sure why the prickly reply.
If we’re on course for 53 points already and this is the worst we’ll ever be, wouldn’t it make sense to keep him in charge longer? 4 or 5 extra wins puts you in a play off spot.
If we’re on course for 53 points already and this is the worst we’ll ever be, wouldn’t it make sense to keep him in charge longer? 4 or 5 extra wins puts you in a play off spot.
No,not solid mid-table,19th last season...I’m pretty confident Walter won’t be sacked even if we fail to beat Oxford.
We’re on course to get around 53 points if we carry on our current trajectory which is not amazing but solid mid table.
Edit: Got my maths a bit wrong, not solid mid table!
Of course I want more but I believe we’ll get more by sticking with him rather than sacking him. It’s way too early for that.No,not solid mid-table,19th last season...
Tim Walter was brought in to entertain us and improve on Rosenior.If we plod away at 1.15 points a game,as opposed to Roseniors 1.52,it would indicate a drop in standard.
That doesn't tie in with the owners aspirations,nor does it excite the 20,000 or so paying supporters.53 points would be a poor return on his investment and would see a drop in revenue(due to lower attendances).
Surely you want more than 1.15 points a game?
I think at this point in time he's hanging by a thread on a game to game basis.Every time we fail to put our opponent's to the sword(ie:-Yesterday) his position is becoming more precarious,the owner looks unhappy with what he's seeing at present,he's irrational at the best of times and I suspect he'll want to see marked improvement before the international break.If not,I think he'll pull the plug,his Club,his call?Of course I want more but I believe we’ll get more by sticking with him rather than sacking him. It’s way too early for that.
I can see the Wally situation dragging on like Ten Hag at Manure. Have a crap run (like the one we are on) Then win a game here and there to save his job - rinse and repeat
No,not solid mid-table,19th last season...
Tim Walter was brought in to entertain us and improve on Rosenior.If we plod away at 1.15 points a game,as opposed to Roseniors 1.52,it would indicate a drop in standard.
That doesn't tie in with the owners aspirations,nor does it excite the 20,000 or so paying supporters.53 points would be a poor return on his investment and would see a drop in revenue(due to lower attendances).
Surely you want more than 1.15 points a game?
I’m of the opinion that anything less than last season’s 1.52 points/game would be a drop in standard. That’s the benchmark he should be judged against.
The “more entertaining” aspect could mitigate against the points total but again this hasn’t materialised in any way, shape or form.
He’s failed, I’m sure there’s only one man’s ego keeping him here, for now.
I’m of the opinion that anything less than last season’s 1.52 points/game would be a drop in standard. That’s the benchmark he should be judged against.
The “more entertaining” aspect could mitigate against the points total but again this hasn’t materialised in any way, shape or form.
He’s failed, I’m sure there’s only one man’s ego keeping him here, for now.
Genuine question, if that's your benchmark, would you be calling for LRs head now if he had stayed and managed the same points total Tim has so far?
If performances, results & league position were as turgid, I think he’d have been gone ages ago,