Every appointment is a risk tho, hes an exciting young coach and done well so far in his careerHe just seems a risk, he will have to adapt to the league and its a unique place
Sometimes the biggest risks can reap the biggest rewards
Every appointment is a risk tho, hes an exciting young coach and done well so far in his careerHe just seems a risk, he will have to adapt to the league and its a unique place
He looks like a coach driver.TBH that's my problem with him.
Staying, all those years, with a club that's clearly lacking ambition makes me think he just wants a cosy life where he's well liked ...
... he seems happy in the lower leagues, which is fair enough, but I want Sunderland to look a lot higher.
I think you're right about Reims and how much they are or aren't punching above their weight. Stade Brestois are certainly more impressive on that front. I think Reims have the 6th richest owner in Ligue 1 in Jean-Pierre Cailot and I think they are about 6th or 7th in how much they spent on transfer fees last season (they did make a profit in terms of transfer fees mind). Although they don't get big attendances (don't think the ground is huge) they are historically one of France's most successful clubs. So it's not like he's dragged some backwater club up from nowhere.He is an interesting coach for sure. I am just not sure everything he seems to believe in as a coach matches up with ourselves. I also think some of the Reims achievements are a little overblown, personally.
In terms of achievements we talk about Reims punching above their weight and Still as the leader of that. I read somewhere recently they have the 12 biggest budget. They look likely to finish 7th - 10th. So they are punching but is it really that big an achievement? How do Brest compare in looking capable of finishing second? Last year he had the benefit of Balogun on loan, who was a but like Diallo for us in terms of impact. The PSG results often get talked up but I am sure the first was against a second string and one was against 10 men. He produced a great unbeaten run when he first took over there. I do get the impression though he hasnt been intune with the club and has been openly critical. He has bemoaned the need to sell his better players, and the loss of his main midfielder in Jan really irked him. I wonder if that really fits into our way of doing things.
In terms of his style of play he relishes crosses into the box, which arguably we dont have the players for. He likes a hard running number 9 who will work the channels. Again we dont have that. He is very aggressive out of play, with high numbers of fouls and tackles (Trai likes this).
Only my view, but I wouldnt be rushing to bring him in based on the admittedly little evidence available. But if he does then it will be a welcome home Will from me.
Tell ya what though, they've transformed the womans team. Lot of giid work going on there
I think what appeals to me about him is that he hasn't taken the traditional route to where he is. That could suggest that he thinks about things in a slightly different way to other coaches. That doesn't necessarily make him any better or any worse than a coach who has come to it off the back of a long career as a pro but it makes him more interesting to me.Every appointment is a risk tho, hes an exciting young coach and done well so far in his career
Sometimes the biggest risks can reap the biggest rewards
)He looks like a coach driver.

If you throw up you clean it up yersel
Sadly that's how I see him mate.
Getting fatter every season and helping old ladies down the steps with that eternal dolphin-faced grin.
"Have a nice cup of tea, back on the bus in 30 minutes."
Like I have mentioned before I am intrigued by Marek Papszun. The way he seems to like to play and how he sets his teams to attack and stifle oppositions at the same time. Big risk I know but would be interestingI think I've said before, I'm keeping counsel on the new coach and whom it may be, because 9 times out of 10, its someone thats never been mentioned.
If us lot on here are anything to go by then whoever we get will have doubters. People seem underwhelmed by Heckingbottom who less than 12 months ago got promoted from this league. I have suggested Mark Robins and folk said no way. If those 2 names arent good enough then I am at a bit of a loss to be honest. Still keeps getting mentioned but I would not be keen on him at all personally. So in reality we wont agree. I hope we accept whoever it is though. If it is Still then fair enough he gets my full support as always. I think we have seen though some coaches will never get a chance with some supporters.
That’s a good argument. Robins might not be keen on changing clubs because he is clever. The odds of coaches being successful at new clubs is probably not great so why give up a good thing to go to a club that is only 20% better, for example?I don't agree with Robins. It only seems to work for him at Coventry, like they fit each other well. Other than his first job at Rotherham in league 2, he's lost more than he's won at the three other clubs, (one of which he left after a disagreement with the board - sound familiar?)
Some managers (and he is a manager, not head coach) just seem to work at one club. Darren Ferguson at Peterborough is another example of this.
He's been building something for a little while there. My theory is that longevity is the key to success so I reckon he'll get them somewhere sooner or later. Would be hard to miss out on that. Hopefully we can hit on a DoF/Head Coach combo of equal longevity.That’s a good argument. Robins might not be keen on changing clubs because he is clever. The odds of coaches being successful at new clubs is probably not great so why give up a good thing to go to a club that is only 20% better, for example?
He's been building something for a little while there. My theory is that longevity is the key to success so I reckon he'll get them somewhere sooner or later. Would be hard to miss out on that. Hopefully we can hit on a DoF/Head Coach combo of equal longevity.
Don’t really understand why Dan Neil can’t shoot on target when his passing can be pin point accurate.There's a lot of names being mentioned on here, I have to admit that I know virtually nothing about any of them so I will place my trust in the club to make the right decision. Regarding the new person bringing in their own 'team', it seems to be the way so fair enough. Many have mentioned a Goalkeeper Coach, can we please make sure that at least one of the team is a Goal Scoring Coach, or perhaps more correctly, as Shooting Coach, as despite the lack or a traditional number 9, almost mythical these days, if only Dan Neil and co could hit the target, we'd be riding high now!
Just my opinion of course.
Maybe he needs to be told to try passing the ball into the net, he can often put a ball past a defender, why not the goalkeeper?Don’t really understand why Dan Neil can’t shoot on target when his passing can be pin point accurate.
Don’t really understand why Dan Neil can’t shoot on target when his passing can be pin point accurate.
Don’t really understand why Dan Neil can’t shoot on target when his passing can be pin point accurate.
I think this is about right. He isnt the only one in our side though, Ekwah is a bad, Roberts too and Adil is poor at shooting from distance as well.Gets anxious,sees a chance,rush of blood,snatches at it......he'll learn.

Cheers mate, good info.I think you're right about Reims and how much they are or aren't punching above their weight. Stade Brestois are certainly more impressive on that front. I think Reims have the 6th richest owner in Ligue 1 in Jean-Pierre Cailot and I think they are about 6th or 7th in how much they spent on transfer fees last season (they did make a profit in terms of transfer fees mind). Although they don't get big attendances (don't think the ground is huge) they are historically one of France's most successful clubs. So it's not like he's dragged some backwater club up from nowhere.
I haven't watched them that much and keep meaning to but something else always comes up.