Match Day Thread Hull City v Bristol City

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Hull City win?

  • City win

  • Brizzle dizzle

  • Draw


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
From the footage I saw it was 'handbags' at best.Young lads do this at Football and if truth be told a fair few on here will have in the past(myself included).A young kid has lost his right to go and see his team for 3 years,bit harsh in my opinion but it is what it is.

Someone is being a bit naive here if they think this isn't going to happen??And those who decry it now from the Club and press need to backtrack a bit and show evidence that they were against rejigging the seating arrangements.
 
From the footage I saw it was 'handbags' at best.Young lads do this at Football and if truth be told a fair few on here will have in the past(myself included).A young kid has lost his right to go and see his team for 3 years,bit harsh in my opinion but it is what it is.

Someone is being a bit naive here if they think this isn't going to happen??And those who decry it now from the Club and press need to backtrack a bit and show evidence that they were against rejigging the seating arrangements.

I think it would help if Baz actually provided any evidence in his article when implicating city fans.

As far as the smoke cannister is concerned, on the one hand 3 year ban seems harsh, but on the other, they were warned and did it anyway so can't really have too many complaints.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HebridesTiger
From the footage I saw it was 'handbags' at best.Young lads do this at Football and if truth be told a fair few on here will have in the past(myself included).A young kid has lost his right to go and see his team for 3 years,bit harsh in my opinion but it is what it is.

Someone is being a bit naive here if they think this isn't going to happen??And those who decry it now from the Club and press need to backtrack a bit and show evidence that they were against rejigging the seating arrangements.

I don’t think it’s harsh in any way. It’s about time proper action was taken against these flares/smoke bombs. Also, I believe throwing of any object that has the potential for harm should result in a minimum 3 year ban. It’s a very cowardly thing to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim the Tiger
I think it would help if Baz actually provided any evidence in his article when implicating city fans.

As far as the smoke cannister is concerned, on the one hand 3 year ban seems harsh, but on the other, they were warned and did it anyway so can't really have too many complaints.
I'm pretty sure he'll regret his moment of madness for the next 3 years but if they're intent on making examples of people then you can bet your bottom dollar that the Hull plod will be scouring through the CCTV as we type,looking for a home fan scapegoat.
 
I'm pretty sure he'll regret his moment of madness for the next 3 years but if they're intent on making examples of people then you can bet your bottom dollar that the Hull plod will be scouring through the CCTV as we type,looking for a home fan scapegoat.
I'm just surprised the Bristol lad stood behind the kid making the blog who is obviously vaping isn't being hunted down as we speak.
 
I don’t think it’s harsh in any way. It’s about time proper action was taken against these flares/smoke bombs. Also, I believe throwing of any object that has the potential for harm should result in a minimum 3 year ban. It’s a very cowardly thing to do.

Smoke canisters pose no threat. They set hundreds off at games innEuropevanscSouthnAmerica with no problems.
Throwing things should carry a longer ban than 3 years. Cowards do that and could seriously injure some innocent person.
 
If it was just an article about the Bristol fan getting a three year ban, nobody would give a ****, he’ll have been aware of the consequences and did it anyway.

It’s lumping that in with an article about the behaviour of City fans that’s the issue, as it seems only one bloke from the SMC saw it.
 
I don’t think it’s harsh in any way. It’s about time proper action was taken against these flares/smoke bombs. Also, I believe throwing of any object that has the potential for harm should result in a minimum 3 year ban. It’s a very cowardly thing to do.

They've been obsessively stamping down on smoke cannisters for years and it's now an almost guaranteed 3-year ban to be in possession of one. How hard do you want them to come down on it?
 
If it was just an article about the Bristol fan getting a three year ban, nobody would give a ****, he’ll have been aware of the consequences and did it anyway.

It’s lumping that in with an article about the behaviour of City fans that’s the issue, as it seems only one bloke from the SMC saw it.

So who is pushing the narrative , the HDM or the SMC ?

Why is this costing 'tens of thousands of pounds' ?
 
If it was just an article about the Bristol fan getting a three year ban, nobody would give a ****, he’ll have been aware of the consequences and did it anyway.

It’s lumping that in with an article about the behaviour of City fans that’s the issue, as it seems only one bloke from the SMC saw it.

Did baz respond to any of the comments asking him to explain it/give more details etc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.