suarez v evra

You watch the tit will argue that she does.


edit: oh look he just did

 

Go on the internet yourself muppet and find me her, then I will see if I will sh*g her

until you come up with something concrete your way of the point of this discussione on Suarez and that cheating racial card abusing evra

Edit: anyone else going out calling for a card today?

 

First of all.....

If Suarez gets found innocent of this I fully expect him to make a claim against evra. If he doesnt then suarez is guilty and the FA bottled it. Plain and simple. Its a major accusation and considering Suarez' career may well be on the line I would fully expect him to take legal action if hes found innocent.

Secondly, many players, managers, coaches etc have been found guilty before. Punishments vary but seem to get stronger and harsher each year.

Liverpool fans have already decided Suarez is innocent though. His past character would suggest otherwise.

 

Sorry UIR but can you explain how past behaviour that is unrelated to racism would suggest he is a racist?

Very strange thing to post.

 

Liverpool fans have basically decided evras lying.

I say theres more chance of Suarez being guilty because when suarez gets accused of something......its tends to be true.

 

Exactly you believe what you read in a tabloid. The Daily Fail some bellends on here call it. Would you believe it if it come out of the Sun? Just because a paper publishes something doesn't mean it to be true does it??

So until you prove to me she doesn't have a sister rather than what a paper says I will believe what I read in the paper

 

they have no proof as hes never made false claims.

Seems it ok for them to condemn Evra based on a load of lies and bullshit.

 

No, you are like the 5th person in half a day to notice this now.

 

What a mixed up individual

 

When has he ever been accused of something which later turned out to be true? I only know one person who tries to cover-up accusations which later turn out to be true and that's a certain Mr. Giggs.

 

Well if you believe what you read in the papers then hows this?

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/.../evra-loses-battle-of-the-bridge-1054287.html

does previous abuse of accusations not count? or did he get the four match ban as they thought he needed a rest?

Now shut up and go to your own board

 

It's Comas/99 would you expect anything less?

 

un·true/ˌənˈtro͞o/
Adjective: Not in accordance with fact or reality; false or incorrect.

For something to be untrue, it must be proven to be untrue, just like for something to be true, it must be proven to be true. If it cannot be proven either way, it's inconclusive.

When was it proved he was lying?

There wasnt enough evidence and the chelsea groundsman was charged with abusing Evra.

 

Admit it scousers, this is how you see it

please log in to view this image

 

That is a quote from the man himself, Luis Suarez. Taken from his official Facebook page.

 

That is a quote from the man himself, Luis Suarez. Taken from his official Facebook page.

 

What? I was referring to Suarez you plank in reply to your comment - What accusations have been made against Suarez that he has denied and then were in fact proved to be true? I then gave you Giggs as an example of such a case

 

I think we all know that is bullshit of the highest order dont we.

Thats if he even wrote it, more likely a Liverpool PR thing. He cant speak english so I doubt he can write it.

 

to be fair UIR is right, he is a scummy manc

 

I was pointing out in defence of evra that for something to be untrue it must be proven to be untrue.

Somebody being found innocent doesnt mean the accuser lied. Not in a million years.