The Official Man Utd & Liverpool plus Chelsea, Everton and City Banter Thread!

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Did you notice how they changed their opinion on our two ''offside goals'' against Arsenal. Apparently now they were ''marginally off-side, and the benefit must go with the attacker''. This was after their two blantantly off-side goals against Chelsea last week. It seems they cry foul only when another team benefits from a decision they don't, and they whine until they benefit from that decision. Hypocrites.
 
Elpistoleros magic feet said:
Did you notice how they changed their opinion on our two ''offside goals'' against Arsenal. Apparently now they were ''marginally off-side, and the benefit must go with the attacker''. This was after their two blantantly off-side goals against Chelsea last week. It seems they cry foul only when another team benefits from a decision they don't, and they whine until they benefit from that decision. Hypocrites.
Click to expand...

You must log in or register to see images
 
Elpistoleros magic feet said:
Did you notice how they changed their opinion on our two ''offside goals'' against Arsenal. Apparently now they were ''marginally off-side, and the benefit must go with the attacker''. This was after their two blantantly off-side goals against Chelsea last week. It seems they cry foul only when another team benefits from a decision they don't, and they whine until they benefit from that decision. Hypocrites.
Click to expand...

Were hypocrites ? On another thread you have just been crying because I called Carroll 'Mandy'. This coming from the 'baconface', Michael Jackson etc etc.

I would call you an absolute ****er, complete and utter prick, cock sucker and all round **** face.... but I won't <ok>
 
KingEric07 said:
Were hypocrites ? On another thread you have just been crying because I called Carroll 'Mandy'. This coming from the 'baconface', Michael Jackson etc etc.

I would call you an absolute ****er, complete and utter prick, cock sucker and all round **** face.... but I won't <ok>
Click to expand...



I would. Whilst adding total **** for good measure.
 
Okay you can call Andy Carroll what you like on one condition, I can poke fun at Best, Law and Charlton. Best the gutless pisshead, Law the turncoat, and Charlton the mouth-piece.
 
I don't need your permission to call Carroll whatever I want.

Now go play with the traffic, there's a good boy <ok>
 
I don't need your permission to poke fun at Best, I'll do it if I want. Only an idiot would put shame on themselves by naming an airport after a drunken,liverwasting, wifebeating crinimal.
 
No chance of a penalty. It was never a hand-ball, even though it wasn't off-side. It was far too close to be considered a handball. Stoke deserved their point and that is a fact.
 
To change the subject a bit...

What do United fans think of that point at Stoke? Are you disappointed with not picking up all three or you happy with a point?

<ok>
 
ChrisWood_LFC said:
To change the subject a bit...

What do United fans think of that point at Stoke? Are you disappointed with not picking up all three or you happy with a point?

<ok>
Click to expand...

Disappointed that after taking the lead we didn't go on and win it but a point away at Stoke isn't a bad point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back