Did you notice how they changed their opinion on our two ''offside goals'' against Arsenal. Apparently now they were ''marginally off-side, and the benefit must go with the attacker''. This was after their two blantantly off-side goals against Chelsea last week. It seems they cry foul only when another team benefits from a decision they don't, and they whine until they benefit from that decision. Hypocrites.
Were hypocrites ? On another thread you have just been crying because I called Carroll 'Mandy'. This coming from the 'baconface', Michael Jackson etc etc. I would call you an absolute ****er, complete and utter prick, cock sucker and all round **** face.... but I won't
I thought you might I of course I would too. I just thought I was being too nice with that description of him
Okay you can call Andy Carroll what you like on one condition, I can poke fun at Best, Law and Charlton. Best the gutless pisshead, Law the turncoat, and Charlton the mouth-piece.
I don't need your permission to call Carroll whatever I want. Now go play with the traffic, there's a good boy
I don't need your permission to poke fun at Best, I'll do it if I want. Only an idiot would put shame on themselves by naming an airport after a drunken,liverwasting, wifebeating crinimal.
No chance of a penalty. It was never a hand-ball, even though it wasn't off-side. It was far too close to be considered a handball. Stoke deserved their point and that is a fact.
Hey Whiney. I sent that PM because I was recieving personal insults, for no other reason. I have and have not personally insulted any other poster. So get a grip.
To change the subject a bit... What do United fans think of that point at Stoke? Are you disappointed with not picking up all three or you happy with a point?
Disappointed that after taking the lead we didn't go on and win it but a point away at Stoke isn't a bad point.
