Membership scheme vote - Concessions to return...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The absolutely mental thing is that they’ve only made the vote available to members, ie. people who are more than likely happy with the ****ty membership scheme. If they were genuinely wanting to increase attendances they would make the vote available to all City fans, yes all, and see pretty quickly that the majority want concessions back. Wouldn’t they?
 
  • Like
Reactions: brownbagtiger, GerryHatrick and Gone For A Walk
Newland Tiger said:
What happened to the north stand ? You can't buy a ticket there if you vote for concessions ?

Are they really saying if you want concessions then everybody has to move , again ?
Click to expand...

PLT said:
I've seen a lot of people assuming that.

I can't believe that would actually be the proposal, but then it's City so they really need to clarify.

Personally I hope people vote. It's by far the best one yet and it's be a big step to improving the situation at the club. I hate the Allams but there's no point refusing to accept something good when it is offered. This for the first time looks like a genuine proposal to bring back concessions. We've fought for that for years and it's really quite unexpected that Ehab has backed down on it.
Click to expand...

That is exactly what is said
It’s not an assumption
The website says the seating plan will revert to the 2010/11 one. It’s actually very clear I think

https://www.hullcitytigers.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Have-Your-Say-Document.pdf

And the photo clearly shows North as Away only
You must log in or register to see images
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newland Tiger
Barchullona said:
Do you think 40% of the members will vote? It could all be meaningless if, once again, apathy rules.
Click to expand...

It’s just the typical bent Allam vote, we’ll only let those who already accept the membership scheme vote and we’ll threaten to move them again if they vote for concessions.

Another vote, same old ****e.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FER ARK, brownbagtiger, BrisbaneTiger and 5 others
I think at the moment I’ll vote for option B for concessions, but if I don’t get offered my original seat in E2 then I would cancel anyway


I think that’s what I think I think
 
  • Like
Reactions: FER ARK
DMD said:
That'd be no problem. Can easily be sorted during the closed season. <ok>
Click to expand...
Unless I get my old seat in E2 back then I demand the following system be implemented

Everyone who has a membership must attend close season and sit in their seats, but stand if they will do during games, then anyone being moved from North must be allowed to wander around and choose who to sit next to. There should be a 5 minute ‘getting to know each other’ period and then if you don’t want to get your seat there (due to annoying conversation, political opinions...or smells etc) the evacuees can get up and move.
This can only happen a maximum of 3 times

Reasonable I think
 
  • Like
Reactions: FER ARK, mplooney, newlandcasual and 4 others
steverico said:
Our club because we only have 12k fans, we might get 3/4K back, but there’s plenty of scope to allow 4K away fans in, Barnsley allow 5.5k away fans
Click to expand...

That assumes the away fans will be in the North. 12,000 plus 1,500 equals 13,500 plus segregation. How many championship clubs filled their allocation this season? Not many. There's nothing stopping him opening the North for Leeds United and Sheffield Wednesday and closing it for the other matches.
 
dennisboothstash said:
Unless I get my old seat in E2 back then I demand the following system be implemented

Everyone who has a membership must attend close season and sit in their seats, but stand if they will do during games, then anyone being moved from North must be allowed to wander around and choose who to sit next to. There should be a 5 minute ‘getting to know each other’ period and then if you don’t want to get your seat there (due to annoying conversation, political opinions...or smells etc) the evacuees can get up and move.
This can only happen a maximum of 3 times

Reasonable I think
Click to expand...

As I don't get a vote at all, as like several generations and many others, it's deemed I've not been affected despite decades of involvement, I'll just agree with anything. <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: HHH and dennisboothstash
Newland Tiger said:
I don't think a lot of people not voting last time was down to apathy , in a rigged vote sometimes the best option is to not participate
Click to expand...

I wasn't particularly referring to the last vote, just the general apathy which abounds due to our owners. I have been a City fan for 56 years but I have serious doubts I will ever get back into it. Have arranged to meet up with some old time acquaintances when/if the Allams go but it will take a lot to get the old feeling back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gone For A Walk and DMD
Obadiah said:
That assumes the away fans will be in the North. 12,000 plus 1,500 equals 13,500 plus segregation. How many championship clubs filled their allocation this season? Not many. There's nothing stopping him opening the North for Leeds United and Sheffield Wednesday and closing it for the other matches.
Click to expand...

Well according to the proposals if we want concessions back then away fans will get the north stand . Actually it's not really clear but they could sell tickets on a game by game basis to home fans but you certainly can't get a membership there.
 
dennisboothstash said:
That is exactly what is said
It’s not an assumption
The website says the seating plan will revert to the 2010/11 one. It’s actually very clear I think

https://www.hullcitytigers.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Have-Your-Say-Document.pdf

And the photo clearly shows North as Away only
You must log in or register to see images
Click to expand...

I saw that, but I just think it's as likely to be a mistake as to be a conscious decision to move seats again. That'd be insane to do, especially without actually telling anyone explicitly.
 
Obadiah said:
That assumes the away fans will be in the North. 12,000 plus 1,500 equals 13,500 plus segregation. How many championship clubs filled their allocation this season? Not many. There's nothing stopping him opening the North for Leeds United and Sheffield Wednesday and closing it for the other matches.
Click to expand...

It would be better if the KC had been better designed in the first place. Reading g can accommodate different numbers of away fans and have just one aisleway as segregation in each instance. We will always end up with more seats lost than that for less than full houses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dennisboothstash
Obadiah said:
That assumes the away fans will be in the North. 12,000 plus 1,500 equals 13,500 plus segregation. How many championship clubs filled their allocation this season? Not many. There's nothing stopping him opening the North for Leeds United and Sheffield Wednesday and closing it for the other matches.
Click to expand...

We'd lose every game on penalties. <yikes>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back