Off Topic Sunday, bloody Sunday.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
As far as I'm aware, he has the right to elect trial by court martial. He's not serving anymore, but I would think as it was a military 'offence' he still has that right.

Thought it would be automatic as the “ offence “ happened while serving . Either way it should be a court martial imho .
 
This just gets better and better. If the stupid bastards had have listened they wouldn't have absorbed some rounds that day.

After learning this, as brb stated, case dismissed.
You forgot to put the word Irish or Paddy between stupid and bastards. Your agenda is as transparent as ****. Got knocked back by a bird from Skibareen did we? Nobody else on this thread, including those who were actually there at the ****ing time, have spouted the anti Irish **** you have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archers Road
err half of my posts are replies to questions you have asked me ,and i had already said in an earlier post i how it worked in cases involving the military , but you are right i've posted too much on this thread so bye.
nah don't be like that man ffs.
 
You forgot to put the word Irish or Paddy between stupid and bastards. Your agenda is as transparent as ****. Got knocked back by a bird from Skibareen did we? Nobody else on this thread, including those who were actually there at the ****ing time, have spouted the anti Irish **** you have.
You took your time, Dan. You've been wanting to do that for ages <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted.......
anything else is a total mockery. mind the whole thing is a farce.

... so a trial by his peers will be the most transparent and absolute guarantee of real justice? ...

My view is that it should be completely independent ... otherwise any subsequent exoneration will be open to accusations of cover up <ok>
 
There's also the issue of the judge making an unusual comment for the record that he had no doubt named IRA leaders (McGuiness I think) were there and armed, despite no evidence being put forward to prove it. The suggestion was he was wanting to make sure any future inquiry was aware.

Other sources have commented that they have no doubt that McGuiness was also carrying a light sabre, the elder wand, a dothraki death curse... and was accompanied by a personal guard of Uruk-hai out of Isengard ... despite no evidence to any of the above this must surely be crucial to the conclusion on whether a British soldier unlawfully killed some unarmed Irish civilians <doh>
 
Other sources have commented that they have no doubt that McGuiness was also carrying a light sabre, the elder wand, a dothraki death curse... and was accompanied by a personal guard of Uruk-hai out of Isengard ... despite no evidence to any of the above this must surely be crucial to the conclusion on whether a British soldier unlawfully killed some unarmed Irish civilians <doh>
Are these other sources on record?