maybe cos you've been posting a lot about the case?i have absolutely no idea how the legal process works in cases like these and tbh am confused why you all seem to think i might have .
i have absolutely no idea how the legal process works in cases like these and tbh am confused why you all seem to think i might have .
The soldier will have the right to choose trial by court martiali have absolutely no idea how the legal process works in cases like these and tbh am confused why you all seem to think i might have .
The soldier will have the right to choose trial by court martial
As far as I'm aware, he has the right to elect trial by court martial. He's not serving anymore, but I would think as it was a military 'offence' he still has that right.Didn’t know they get the choice .
As far as I'm aware, he has the right to elect trial by court martial. He's not serving anymore, but I would think as it was a military 'offence' he still has that right.
anything else is a total mockery. mind the whole thing is a farce.Thought it would be automatic as the “ offence “ happened while serving
You forgot to put the word Irish or Paddy between stupid and bastards. Your agenda is as transparent as ****. Got knocked back by a bird from Skibareen did we? Nobody else on this thread, including those who were actually there at the ****ing time, have spouted the anti Irish **** you have.This just gets better and better. If the stupid bastards had have listened they wouldn't have absorbed some rounds that day.
After learning this, as brb stated, case dismissed.
err half of my posts are replies to questions you have asked me ,and i had already said in an earlier post i how it worked in cases involving the military , but you are right i've posted too much on this thread so bye.maybe cos you've been posting a lot about the case?
nah don't be like that man ffs.err half of my posts are replies to questions you have asked me ,and i had already said in an earlier post i how it worked in cases involving the military , but you are right i've posted too much on this thread so bye.
You took your time, Dan. You've been wanting to do that for agesYou forgot to put the word Irish or Paddy between stupid and bastards. Your agenda is as transparent as ****. Got knocked back by a bird from Skibareen did we? Nobody else on this thread, including those who were actually there at the ****ing time, have spouted the anti Irish **** you have.

Can you not stand by your words?

anything else is a total mockery. mind the whole thing is a farce.

There's also the issue of the judge making an unusual comment for the record that he had no doubt named IRA leaders (McGuiness I think) were there and armed, despite no evidence being put forward to prove it. The suggestion was he was wanting to make sure any future inquiry was aware.

Are these other sources on record?Other sources have commented that they have no doubt that McGuiness was also carrying a light sabre, the elder wand, a dothraki death curse... and was accompanied by a personal guard of Uruk-hai out of Isengard ... despite no evidence to any of the above this must surely be crucial to the conclusion on whether a British soldier unlawfully killed some unarmed Irish civilians![]()