We are nowhere near ready for premier yet, so in hindsight they should have let IH see out his last year & groomed youngsters for another season & then bring in an experienced manager & maybe push for play offs the following season.
Agree with this. Seems we have a choice, go with an older, experienced manager who hasn't been successful enough to stick with one club (Wenger, Ferguson, Moyes at Everton) or risk it with a younger manager but potentially un-earth a gem as Huddersfield, Bournemouth and Watford have done. I'd far rather take the risk, we've tried the older, experienced managers and they have been very disappointing.
Wasn't JFH a "potential" gem, but was found out that he'd beem riding on the coat-tails of Rowetts squad.....another disasterous appointment.
Like Graham Potter from Ostersunds, who got them to the knock out stages of the Europa League and only narrowly lost to Arsenal there. Perfect man for a long term project, out of our league now.True. He was also already well known. I'm dreaming of plucking someone from the unknown and giving them a chance. Mad, I know.
McClaren.
Oh. Christ. No.
There has to be some progress and I don't just mean by 3pts over a season or 5 away wins in 40 odd games. Progress in style, progress in play and progress in selection. Totally agree with you Col.If it is to be Maclaren I will hope to see better football and consistency in selection at the very least. Maybe it will be his time to come good in a managerial role.
Ham & cheese for me, please!![]()


Sorry dude
You must log in or register to see images
![]()
For some reason I’m reminded of a girl I went out with once...

Got no problems with McClsren coming in if he wants it, seems you don’t approve then after digging up that RTID? You could go through a whole list of managers with indifferent stats but doesn’t mean they won’t succeed, probably needless to write or print that.Why don't we look at some facts to drive our opinions?
http://www.managerstats.co.uk/managers/steve-mcclaren/
Not pretty reading I'm afraid. Unless I am mistaken, the graph looks fairly depressing and poses the question as to why The Board would actually want to appoint a man with that record? With every successive managerial post, without exception, his win rate has got worse.
Do you think we should print this off and post it snail mail to The Board as part of their 'due diligence'?
We've seen this so many times with managers and players. Either they or The Board believe it will be better this time at QPR. In this instance, history suggests it will probably not be so.
Ironically, Ollie's team was improving as time was going by.Why don't we look at some facts to drive our opinions?
http://www.managerstats.co.uk/managers/steve-mcclaren/
Not pretty reading I'm afraid. Unless I am mistaken, the graph looks fairly depressing and poses the question as to why The Board would actually want to appoint a man with that record? With every successive managerial post, without exception, his win rate has got worse.
Do you think we should print this off and post it snail mail to The Board as part of their 'due diligence'?
We've seen this so many times with managers and players. Either they or The Board believe it will be better this time at QPR. In this instance, history suggests it will probably not be so.