The Big Meeting

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
If I see anything that refers to him as a doctor, then yes you're correct, I'd totally stop reading as soon as I came across that. Like it or not I prefer items that I read to be accurate, referring to him as a doctor is totally inaccurate so I wouldn't waste my time reading it.
It’s up to you, but personally, I think that it’s your loss. If that stopped you reading further, it means you missed the bit about the free chocolates.
 
I'm not reading through pages of posts.
What was the outcome? I would appreciate it if it could be summarised in an Exec summary of no more than 100 words.
Tar...
 
I thought that there were some significant elements

An admission that mistakes in communicating with fans were made.

Acknowledgement that there needs to be long term solutions to issues.

That there will be stability to the make up of the committee.

That a concession turnstile will be investigated.

If the club isn’t sold the family will not be involved in the day to day operation.

A new badge for next season with supporter involvement in its design.

If these are genuine, then fine, the committee is working. If they prove not to be it is a wasted opportunity for all. I
 
Best case scenario: We realise that, once the parachument payments run out, the club will be loss making. At this point the fans become relevant again. We can't be seen to back down on our stance on anything. We appoint someone to run the club so that we can pretend that they are making concessions rather than us. The fans come flocking back and we can stay in charge, without having to expend any energy on running the club.
 
I don't see anything in any reports of the meeting that they discussed or are even looking at using the word City. Is this no longer an issue?
 
I don't see anything in any reports of the meeting that they discussed or are even looking at using the word City. Is this no longer an issue?

HCST - 'We reiterated our call for them to simply use the club’s correct name on all platforms. Ehab Allam expressed that he wouldn’t be ‘bullied’ into a change on this.'
 
A note re branding.... Just noticed the official instagram account is now named hullcity, I'm pretty sure it's been hulltigers previous?
 
Only one of the above is true, make your own guess as to which one.

Before I make a decision, could you just clarify what type of space hopper?

Is it one of those orange rubbery things?

Sorry to ask what appears to be an obvious question, but I don't want to make a rash decision.

I thank you.
 
Thing is, if all transfers still have to be ratified with Allam, the final decisions still rest with Allam and any advertising or branding issues are finalised with Allam, then what exactly is this 3rd party going to do? It’s pointless, unless it paves the way for a takeover from within.

Probably an Ann Summers party selling dildos and other toilet area equipment.