Okay, fair point; I don't disagree, and I don't find it particularly interesting or odd as it is a logical progression and in line with their previous actions; I have always said they have a strategy and they should not be underestimated, as they frequently are on here. Companies have been and that is what the club is at the end of the day. The operational infrastructure should be much the same- but will evolve with income and savings - only answering to different bean counters. It's what folk are referring to as being placed in administration without the legal obligations and need for the administrators to be 'a court appointed administrator – who must be a licensed insolvency practitioner (IP). If they are licensed (and they will be) then placing the club in administration, when the Allams trigger it from a distance, will be flawless and is probably the endgame unless a sale is made, which I believe is increasingly unlikely. That's my take on it, Dennis, although I am interested to get the thoughts of better qualified posters.
Oh I am very sorry, I read it as you telling me to **** off and after reviewing your post I have to conclude that you didn’t. That said only a dopey **** would have posted it like that and so you can “**** off” in quotation marks.
Aww bless. You wrongly take personal offence in a post that had nothing to do with you (you were only quoted because you posted some notes from the meeting) then rather than just say ‘oops I was wrong, sorry’ you continue with foul mouthed undeserved insults. I don’t know you, but I can tell you’re clearly a pleasant, well spoken individual.
I’m a football supporter posting on a football forum, not the ****ing Vicar of Dibley “mate”. And this isn’t Not 606 Songs of Praise. Your post was poorly constructed, thats the truth of it.
Sure. You keep telling yourself that. You seem mightily stressed for some reason. Like you’re spoiling for an argument for no reason with someone you don’t know. You ok hun? PM me bbz.
