Henriksen

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
H

Hutch-tiger69

Well-Known Member
Jul 10, 2015
1,412
626
113
43
doesnt look at all interested im not getting what slutskys seeing, lazy doesn't track runners and doesn't seem interested in wanting the ball
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howden Tigress
Will this manager ever learn.
We have been gash for the 3rd game in a row.
 
Henriksen was absolutely awful. Larsson is then left trying to do the work of 2 midfielders. As for Kingsley - ****ing hopeless. I'd rather start with Clark. Kingsley on two occasions tried tracking a Sunderland player back and it looked like he was running through wet concrete.

Just about the worst performance I can remember from a left back and I have watched some ****e in my time following City.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tony Angelino, Kempton, look_back_in_amber and 1 other person
GLP said:
Henriksen was absolutely awful. Larsson is then left trying to do the work of 2 midfielders. As for Kingsley - ****ing hopeless. I'd rather start with Clark. Kingsley on two occasions tried tracking a Sunderland player back and it looked like he was running through wet concrete.

Just about the worst performance I can remember from a left back and I have watched some ****e in my time following City.
Click to expand...
I'm glad you said that GLP.... awful awful player.. no wonder Grosicki looked disinterested... at fault for their goal volleying the ball to someone in midfield, ball out to the right, no speed to get back, cross comes in unopposed and goal.. He is Division 3 standard at the very best...
 
TIGERSCAVE said:
I'm glad you said that GLP.... awful awful player.. no wonder Grosicki looked disinterested... at fault for their goal volleying the ball to someone in midfield, ball out to the right, no speed to get back, cross comes in unopposed and goal.. He is Division 3 standard at the very best...
Click to expand...

He doesn't even look like a footballer to me.
 
He's an absolute fraud. You could see him literally hiding behind Sunderland players so that he couldn't receive a pass. Constantly got into positions that meant he couldn't receive the ball, or just pointed to other players who should've receiving a pass.

Genuinely disgraceful performance.

Kingsley just looks a bad player, but Henriksen is a disgrace. Hiding from the ball and not even making an effort off the ball either.

How does he get anywhere near the bench with that performance today?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fettis the striker, Real ale tiger and DERRICK THE TIGER
I can't remember ever seeing our midfield be so poor as in that first half.

Often people exaggerate a poor performance so when a really genuinely poor one comes along it's hard to properly express how bad it really is. But this wasn't just a half where we were frustrated and couldn't get past their midfield; we couldn't even get the ball past their strikers without losing it.

Slutsky gave a good reason for not starting Meyler, but why his first alternative is Henriksen completely baffles me. Makes you wonder who wanted to sign Irvine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnbo and Tuckin
I thought Henriksen was decent in the first 10-15 minutes. Linked up play, set up a chance with a nice through ball, was eager to get involved. Then a switch was flicked and he drifted out of the game completely. Doesn't strike me as a happy bunny.
 
PLT said:
I can't remember ever seeing our midfield be so poor as in that first half.

Often people exaggerate a poor performance so when a really genuinely poor one comes along it's hard to properly express how bad it really is. But this wasn't just a half where we were frustrated and couldn't get past their midfield; we couldn't even get the ball past their strikers without losing it.

Slutsky gave a good reason for not starting Meyler, but why his first alternative is Henriksen completely baffles me. Makes you wonder who wanted to sign Irvine.
Click to expand...
Posted this the other day is Irvine,Slutsky signing.
 
PLT said:
I can't remember ever seeing our midfield be so poor as in that first half.

Often people exaggerate a poor performance so when a really genuinely poor one comes along it's hard to properly express how bad it really is. But this wasn't just a half where we were frustrated and couldn't get past their midfield; we couldn't even get the ball past their strikers without losing it.

Slutsky gave a good reason for not starting Meyler, but why his first alternative is Henriksen completely baffles me. Makes you wonder who wanted to sign Irvine.
Click to expand...
I can't think of a single good reason not to start Meyler. What was his reason.?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Real ale tiger and look_back_in_amber
An utter disgrace to the shirt .. if Henriksen starts the next game I am personally gonna wipe my arse with my city shirt and deliver it at Sluts door ! I have never seen such a show of cowardice in my life .. no bottle .. no interest .. no energy .. no desire .. no skill .. do I need to go on .. and anyone defending this shower of **** please explain to me what he offers
 
  • Like
Reactions: Real ale tiger
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back