Transfer Rumours January Incoming/Outgoing...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
They have made two derisory offers and that is insulting; yes, we should be disgusted, as they are wasting everyone's time.

We get derisory offers for players every day of the transfer window, the difference is these bids have been made public.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PLT
They have made two derisory offers and that is insulting; yes, we should be disgusted, as they are wasting everyone's time.

Besides...Ehaw likes to make everyone overpay...fans, potential new owners and other football clubs when buying our players! Brady, Long & Chester spring to mind
 
Besides...Ehaw likes to make everyone overpay...fans, potential new owners and other football clubs when buying our players! Brady, Long & Chester spring to mind

Don't really know what to make of that.
 
Bummers used to work in football so I don't think it's hard to believe him when he says that there are a lot of bids flying around that the public don't hear about.

As for West Ham and Snodgrass, I just don't get the problem. If the bids are too low, so what? We've turned them down. From their point of view he's the best player at a basketcase club. It's logical for them to think that he might want out and that they can get him relatively cheap. It's only a couple of million less than we paid for him anyway.

We'd complain if City just flew in with overpriced offers for players without trying to get the price down first. I don't get why we're meant to be angry at other clubs trying to get the best deal as we'd expect ours to. Makes us look a bit whiny I think.
 
Bummers used to work in football so I don't think it's hard to believe him when he says that there are a lot of bids flying around that the public don't hear about.

As for West Ham and Snodgrass, I just don't get the problem. If the bids are too low, so what? We've turned them down. From their point of view he's the best player at a basketcase club. It's logical for them to think that he might want out and that they can get him relatively cheap. It's only a couple of million less than we paid for him anyway.

We'd complain if City just flew in with overpriced offers for players without trying to get the price down first. I don't get why we're meant to be angry at other clubs trying to get the best deal as we'd expect ours to. Makes us look a bit whiny I think.

Because West Ham are doing it to numerous clubs in an attempt to turn players' heads. We aren't the only set of fans they've pissed off so not quite sure why you're trying to put down our supporter base. Pretty much everyone thinks they're a laughing stock.

And if we really were receiving daily 'derisory' bids, we'd either put none or all of them out into the press, to either jack up a player's price in a bidding war, or ignore entirely. I have no idea why we'd publicly reject some but not others which is why I'm not sure if Bummers is confusing official inquiries with formal bids. Being in Australia though, clearly I have everything upside down. :emoticon-0112-wonde
 
  • Like
Reactions: djsowtz
Because West Ham are doing it to numerous clubs in an attempt to turn players' heads. We aren't the only set of fans they've pissed off so not quite sure why you're trying to put down our supporter base. Pretty much everyone thinks they're a laughing stock.

And if we really were receiving daily 'derisory' bids, we'd either put none or all of them out into the press, to either jack up a player's price in a bidding war, or ignore entirely. I have no idea why we'd publicly reject some but not others which is why I'm not sure if Bummers is confusing official inquiries with formal bids. Being in Australia though, clearly I have everything upside down. :emoticon-0112-wonde

I think Bummers would understand how this works better than almost anyone on here.

I don't think that we're the ones talking about these offers. Seems like West Ham are for some reason doing all their business in public. I can understand why that might annoy the clubs they're trying to buy from, but really if they want to unsettle a player they can do that in private. Look at Payet and Marseille.
 
I think Bummers would understand how this works better than almost anyone on here.

I don't think that we're the ones talking about these offers. Seems like West Ham are for some reason doing all their business in public. I can understand why that might annoy the clubs they're trying to buy from, but really if they want to unsettle a player they can do that in private. Look at Payet and Marseille.

Payet wasn't unsettled by Marseille, his family has moved back to France and he wants to go with them.
 
I understand clubs putting lower bids in for players, as you aren't going to go to a club and say we can afford £12m for a player, how much do you want?

Of course they are going to start lower and work there way towards the target or meet in the middle with the club. My issue is the fact someone keeps leaking the offers. Now I am sure it isn't anyone at City's end as why would we want speculation out around one of our players? The only thing this could do is increase interest from other clubs and further unsettle Snodgrass.

I just find it puzzling that West Ham are fuming with Payet and him demanding a move, yet they continue to make public low bids for a number of players. It's too much of a coincidence that bids for Hogan, Snodgrass and Defoe have all become public, and all of them had a ridiculously low starting price.
 
Brazilian forward Gabriel Jesus has now received international clearance and could make his debut for Man City against Spurs at the weekend (fee £27m).

West Ham are in advanced talks to sign Southampton defender Jose Fonte (presumably they've finally made a decent offer).

Aston Villa are believed to have had £6m bid for Middlesbrough striker Jordan Rhodes rejected.

Everton have rejected a bid from Italian side AC Milan to take winger Gerard Deulofeu on loan.

Arsenal defender Per Mertesacker has signed a one-year contract extension.

Liverpool have rejected a loan bid from Southampton for defender Mamadou Sakho.
 
Bummers used to work in football so I don't think it's hard to believe him when he says that there are a lot of bids flying around that the public don't hear about.

As for West Ham and Snodgrass, I just don't get the problem. If the bids are too low, so what? We've turned them down. From their point of view he's the best player at a basketcase club. It's logical for them to think that he might want out and that they can get him relatively cheap. It's only a couple of million less than we paid for him anyway.

We'd complain if City just flew in with overpriced offers for players without trying to get the price down first. I don't get why we're meant to be angry at other clubs trying to get the best deal as we'd expect ours to. Makes us look a bit whiny I think.

Doesn't the saying go "if you're not embarrassed by your first offer, you've offered too much?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: PLT